Can someone help me find the moment generating function of a random walk?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving the moment generating function for a specific random walk defined by the evolution rules w(t+1)=w(t) with probability p and w(t+1)=w(t)+C*(1-w(t))*f with probability 1-p. Participants detail the calculation of expected values E(w(t)) and E(w(t)^2), utilizing recurrence relations and initial conditions to determine constants. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the first and second moments of the random walk, leading to a general solution for w(t) and its moments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of random walks in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with moment generating functions
  • Knowledge of recurrence relations in probability theory
  • Basic concepts of expected value and variance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment generating functions in stochastic processes
  • Learn about recurrence relations and their applications in probability
  • Explore advanced topics in statistical mechanics related to random walks
  • Investigate the properties of Brownian motion and its relation to random walks
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and statisticians interested in stochastic processes, particularly those analyzing random walks and their statistical properties.

humenghu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, can someone who is familiar with the analysis of random walks (statistical mechanics, condensed matter physics etc.) help me on solving a particular problem?

We define the following random walk, the random variable w(t) is evolved as

w(t+1)=w(t), with probability of p;

w(t+1)=w(t)+C*(1-w(t))*f, with probability 1-p.

C is a constant, f is a random variable with known distribution, and f is not correlated with w.

Following the way of analyzing a Brownian motion, what I have tried is to write down
E(w(t)|w(t-1),p), then show the E(w(t)|p) using the induction, for a given w(0).

Next, at least I need to find the Var(w(t)) , or equivalently E(w(t)^2) since I have known (E(w(t)))^2 for a given w(0).

I hope that someone can help me find the moment generating function of this random walk

(E(w(t)^n)), or alternatively just the mean and the variance of w(t). Any hint on this is badly needed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can obtain E(w(t)) as something of the form A+Bλt, right?
You should also get a recurrence relation on E(w(t)2) which involves E(w(t)). This should have a solution like C+Dλt+Eμt.
Plugging in the coefficients from the recurrence relations and the initial conditions should allow you to determine the 7 constants.
 
haruspex said:
You can obtain E(w(t)) as something of the form A+Bλt, right?
You should also get a recurrence relation on E(w(t)2) which involves E(w(t)). This should have a solution like C+Dλt+Eμt.
Plugging in the coefficients from the recurrence relations and the initial conditions should allow you to determine the 7 constants.


Thanks for the hint.

Yeah the E(W_{n})=K^{n}W_{0}+K^{n-1}L+K^{n-2}L+...+KL+L

Where K=p-C(1-p)E(f), L=C(1-p)E(f).

However I found that the E(Wt^{2}) is a little bit hard to show since the terms grow somehow fast with n. I could write down:

E(W_{n}^{2})=A^{n-1}M+ A^{n-2}[BE(W_{1})+C]+ A^{n-3}[BE(W_{2})+C]+...A[BE(W_{n-2})+C]+[BE(W_{n-1})+C]

where A,B,C are terms consisting of p, C and random variable f.M=AE(W_{0}^{2})+BE(W_{0})+C

so do you think this is what you meant? or?

Addtionally I am still curious about the moments of the Wt, in a general sense. Is it possible to show them in closed form here?
 
humenghu said:
Yeah the E(W_{n})=K^{n}W_{0}+K^{n-1}L+K^{n-2}L+...+KL+L

Where K=p-C(1-p)E(f), L=C(1-p)E(f).
I don't think it should be that bad.
K^{n}W_{0}+K^{n-1}L+K^{n-2}L+...+KL+L
= K^{n}W_{0}+L(K^n-1)/(K-1)
= K^{n}(W_{0}+L/(K-1))-L/(K-1)
So as I said, it is possible to represent the first moment as A+BKn, and the second moment will have only two additional constants.
 
Now I see what you mean. Thanks a lot!

Did you magically predict the first two moments just by looking at the evolution rules? or did you actually write down the terms like I did, any additional tips on this ?
 
I wrote out the recurrence relation for w(t) and saw it took the form
w(t+1) = Aw(t) + B.
Clearly this is basically multiplying by A at each step, so the answer will be something with At. To cover the inhomogeneous term (the B), look for a stationary value, i.e. w(t+1) = w(t) = w:
w = Aw+B
w = B/(1-A)
So now we have a general solution of w(t+1) = Aw(t), and a specific solution of w(t+1) = Aw(t) + B. Since the relationship is linear, we can add any multiple of the homogeneous solution to the inhomogeneous one:
w(t) = cAt + B/(1-A)

The recurrence relation for w2 is of the form
w2(t+1) = Dw2(t) + Ew(t) + F
= Dw2(t) + E(cAt + B/(1-A)) + F
Collecting up constants, this reduces to
w2(t+1) = Dw2(t) + E'At + F'
Again, the homogeneous part gives w2(t) = gDt. What to do with E'At? Iterating the recurrence will result in adding terms like that for successive values of t, i.e. the sum of a geometric series. So we know this will add a term like At to the answer. So just assume an answer of the form gDt + hAt + k, plug it into the recurrence relation and initial conditions, and see what you get for g, h and k.
 
I see. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K