Is Spacetime Capable of Tearing or Breaking Down?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter r.hackett
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of spacetime potentially tearing or breaking down, particularly in the context of black holes and Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Participants explore the mathematical implications of topology, noting that while General Relativity (GR) allows for theoretical solutions where spacetime "rips," these scenarios often involve negative mass or singularities that are not physically realizable. The conversation highlights the uncertainty surrounding the behavior of spacetime under extreme conditions, with references to the works of Guth and Farhi, as well as Sean Carroll's cosmological models.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Theory of Relativity
  • Familiarity with General Relativity (GR) concepts
  • Basic knowledge of topology and its mathematical implications
  • Awareness of black hole singularities and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of General Relativity on spacetime structure
  • Study the mathematical principles of topology in relation to spacetime
  • Explore the works of Alan Guth and Edward Farhi on cosmological models
  • Investigate Sean Carroll's theories on eternal cosmology and information loss
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and cosmologists interested in the theoretical aspects of spacetime, black hole physics, and the intersection of mathematics and physical reality.

r.hackett
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The concept of spacetime ripping or breaking (down) is common in science fiction, but does it have any basis in real physics? Inside the singularity of a Black Hole, it seems that spacetime is stretched infinitely by gravity (conjecture, but a common belief, right?), but could it be possible that spacetime breaks down in some way at a certain point, possibly causing information to be lost forever?

I feel that it may not even be a meaningful question in reality (i.e. does it even make sense to assume that spacetime could do anything resembling tearing or breaking?), but I am curious of people's opinions or insight into this.

edit:
Of course,this is all in the context of Einstein's Theory of Relativity (referring to "spacetime").
 
Space news on Phys.org
r.hackett said:
The concept of spacetime ripping or breaking (down) is common in science fiction, but does it have any basis in real physics?

Some.

First a bit of definition. There is a branch of math called topology which is the study of how things behave when you try to bend them. You can bend a cube into a sphere, so they are in the same topological group. You can't bend a cube into a donut, so that's a different topological group.

There's an entire complicated branch of mathematics devoted to figuring out if you can bend thing A into thing B without ripping something apart.

So the question you are asking is whether you can change the topological group of space-time. And the answer is ...

We aren't sure...

There *are* solutions of GR in which space-time "rips" but these involve situations that we think aren't possible (i.e. you can rip a hole in space time with negative mass). Also weird things that no one understands at the singularity of black hole.

Also "space-time" is a mathematical tool. We aren't sure if it's the right mathematical tool to be use in the theory of everything.

Inside the singularity of a Black Hole, it seems that spacetime is stretched infinitely by gravity (conjecture, but a common belief, right?), but could it be possible that spacetime breaks down in some way at a certain point, possibly causing information to be lost forever?

Yes. It's possible. That's problem. We don't know what happens so pretty much anything is possible. It's possible that information gets destroyed at the singularity. It's also possible that it doesn't.

I feel that it may not even be a meaningful question in reality (i.e. does it even make sense to assume that spacetime could do anything resembling tearing or breaking?), but I am curious of people's opinions or insight into this.

It makes sense. There is an entire branch of mathematics devoted to this. We don't know the answers, but we can ask the question in precise mathematical terms.
 
Didnt Guth and Farhi do some work on this? I don't remember the reference so maybe someone else know about it. But I am pretty sure they wrot e apaper on this and Sean Caroll based his eternal cosmology model on it.
 
Yes, but, as twofish pointed out, it relies on assumptions that are unsupported by observation - like gravitational singularities..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K