Can Super Mercurys Support Life and Sustainable Plate Tectonics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KTevolved
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of super Mercurys, which are hypothesized to be Earth-sized or larger planets with dense iron cores. Participants consider whether these planets could support life, possess thick atmospheres, and sustain plate tectonics, drawing comparisons to super Earths and Mercury.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that super Mercurys could exist and raise questions about their potential to support life and sustain plate tectonics.
  • Others argue that the current understanding of super Earths does not adequately differentiate between planets similar to Earth and those similar to Mercury, complicating the classification of super Mercurys.
  • A participant questions whether Earth itself could be classified as a super Mercury based on certain definitions.
  • Another participant suggests that using orbital distance from a star as a criterion could lead to identifying extra-solar planets as super Mercurys, but emphasizes that density criteria would limit the classification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of super Mercurys and the implications for their potential to support life and geological activity. There is no consensus on the definitions or characteristics that would qualify a planet as a super Mercury.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in current definitions and criteria for classifying super Mercurys, particularly regarding density and orbital distance from stars. There are unresolved questions about the implications of these factors for the potential habitability and geological characteristics of such planets.

KTevolved
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
So we know there are super Earths, but what about super mercurys? These planets would be about Earth sized maybe bigger with large dense iron cores. So could these super mercurys support life, have thick dense atmospheres and generate sustainable plate tectonics? I've always wondered about this ever since we discovered super Earths.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I do not think knowledge about super Earth's is good enough to distinguish between "similar to Earth but larger" and "similar to mercury but larger". As far as I know, everything rocky and larger than Earth is called "super earth".
 
KTevolved said:
So we know there are super Earths, but what about super mercurys? These planets would be about Earth sized maybe bigger with large dense iron cores.

By this definition, wouldn't Earth be a super mercury?
 
If we use orbital-distance-from-star criteria, then we certainly have discovered extra-solar planets that are much closer to their suns than Mercury is to ours. So in that distance sense, they might be viewed as super-Mercuries. But if we include density in the criteria, then we will have fewer choices in what we call a super Mercury. I'm not sure if they have found one with Mercury's density that close or closer to its star yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K