Can the A and φ potentials be fixed in a region of space?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cuallito
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potentials Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of fixing the magnetic and electric potentials (A and φ) to zero or some constant value in a region of space. Participants explore the implications of gauge equivalence, the nature of potentials in electromagnetism, and the conditions under which these potentials can be considered constant.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the potentials can be fixed to constant values, questioning if a hollow conducting sphere connected to a voltage source would maintain constant potentials inside.
  • Others argue that potentials are only physically meaningful up to gauge equivalence, indicating that they cannot be uniquely determined without gauge fixing conditions.
  • A participant points out that while potentials can take constant values in one gauge, they may not correspond to constant values in another gauge.
  • Another participant explains that the Lorenz gauge condition allows for the addition of certain functions to the potentials, which can affect their constancy.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of gauge invariance in Maxwell's theory, noting that the electromagnetic field is observable while the potentials are not uniquely defined.
  • There is a mention of the differential form language in electromagnetism, where adding a differential of a scalar function to the potential does not change the field tensor.
  • A participant highlights that the Lorenz gauge is a partial gauge fixing, which leaves residual gauge freedom, affecting the constancy of the potentials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of potentials and their constancy. There is no consensus on whether the potentials can be fixed to constant values, and the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes limitations related to gauge fixing conditions, the ambiguity of potentials in different gauges, and the mathematical implications of gauge invariance. These aspects are not fully resolved within the conversation.

cuallito
Messages
94
Reaction score
1
Can the magnetic and electric potentials (A and φ) be fixed to zero, or at least some constant value in a region of space? Naively, I'd think something like this might work (a hollow conducting sphere connected to a voltage source connected to ground, would the potentials inside the sphere be constant?):
1666295158091.png
 

Attachments

  • 1666295144686.png
    1666295144686.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 117
Physics news on Phys.org
The potentials are only physical up to gauge equivalence. Hence, they cannot be uniquely determined by physics alone without also adhering to some gauge fixing conditions. This also means that the question in itself is ill defined.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and cuallito
I take your point, but wouldn't the potentials equaling one constant value in one gauge equal another constant value in another gauge?
 
cuallito said:
I take your point, but wouldn't the potentials equaling one constant value in one gauge equal another constant value in another gauge?
No.
 
Can you please explain why?
 
cuallito said:
I take your point, but wouldn't the potentials equaling one constant value in one gauge equal another constant value in another gauge?
Consider ##A'^\mu=A^\mu+v^\mu## where ##v^x=y## and all other components are zero. The Lorenz condition is that ##\partial_\mu A^\mu=0##, which is satisfied by ##A'^\mu## if it is satisfied by ##A^\mu##, since ##\partial_\mu v^\mu=\partial y/\partial x = 0##, but ##A'## is manifestly not constant if ##A## is. And this is in the same gauge.
 
cuallito said:
Can you please explain why?
Suppose that ##\vec A## is a vector potential of ##\vec V##, i.e., ##\vec V = \nabla\times \vec A##. Then, if we let ##\vec A' = \vec A + \nabla \phi## for any scalar field ##\phi##, then ##\nabla\times \vec A' = \nabla\times(\vec A + \nabla\phi) = \nabla\times\vec A = \vec V## so ##\vec A'## is also a vector potential of ##\vec V##. As long as you pick ##\phi## such that ##\nabla\phi## is not constant both potentials cannot be constant.

Ibix said:
Consider ##A'^\mu=A^\mu+v^\mu## where ##v^x=y## and all other components are zero. The Lorenz condition is that ##\partial_\mu A^\mu=0##, which is satisfied by ##A'^\mu## if it is satisfied by ##A^\mu##, since ##\partial_\mu v^\mu=\partial y/\partial x = 0##, but ##A'## is manifestly not constant if ##A## is. And this is in the same gauge.
That would be because the Lorenz gauge is only a partial gauge fixing and leaves a residual gauge freedom.
 
Also, in the language of differential forms, where the 4-potential ##A## is a 1-form on spacetime containing both the scalar and vector potentials of electromagnetism, we have the field tensor ##F = dA##. Adding the differential of any spacetime function ##\phi## to ##A##, i.e., ##A' = A + d\phi## leaves the same field tensor ##F = dA' = dA + d^2 \phi = dA## as ##d^2 = 0##.
 
Orodruin said:
That would be because the Lorenz gauge is only a partial gauge fixing and leaves a residual gauge freedom.
So I am wrong to say "the same gauge" because the Lorenz gauge condition specifies a family of possible gauge fixings, of which I picked two?
 
  • #10
Ibix said:
So I am wrong to say "the same gauge" because the Lorenz gauge condition specifies a family of possible gauge fixings, of which I picked two?
If by ”the same gauge” you intend a gauge that completely fixes the gauge freedom then yes. The Lorenz gauge still leaves the freedom to add the gradient of any harmonic function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #11
Orodruin said:
Suppose that ##\vec A## is a vector potential of ##\vec V##, i.e., ##\vec V = \nabla\times \vec A##. Then, if we let ##\vec A' = \vec A + \nabla \phi## for any scalar field ##\phi##, then ##\nabla\times \vec A' = \nabla\times(\vec A + \nabla\phi) = \nabla\times\vec A = \vec V## so ##\vec A'## is also a vector potential of ##\vec V##. As long as you pick ##\phi## such that ##\nabla\phi## is not constant both potentials cannot be constant.
Thanks, it's a good thing we have people like you on here. Is ##\phi## here the same thing as the electric potential, or is it any arbitrary scalar potential you can add to ## \vec A## ?
 
  • #12
cuallito said:
Thanks, it's a good thing we have people like you on here. Is ##\phi## here the same thing as the electric potential, or is it any arbitrary scalar potential you can add to ## \vec A## ?
It is an arbitrary scalar function. I was only discussing the case of a vector field with a vector potential. The case of electromagnetism is analogous and what I discussed in the follow-up post.
 
  • #13
The electromagnetic potentials ##\Phi## and ##\vec{A}## are not uniquely defined by the physical situation and thus are not observable fields in Maxwell's theory. The electromagnetic field ##(\vec{E},\vec{B})## are observables.

The potentials are introduced as "auxiliary" mathematical quantities to fulfill the homogeneous Maxwell equations identically, i.e., you set
$$\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}, \quad \vec{E}=-\partial_t \vec{A}/c -\vec{\nabla} \Phi.$$
Then indeed the two homogeneous Maxwell equations,
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}+\partial_t \vec{B}/c=0$$
are identically fulfilled (check this!).

But for given ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## also
$$\Phi'=\Phi+\partial_t \chi/c, \quad \vec{A}'=\vec{A}-\vec{\nabla} \chi$$
lead to the same ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## as ##\Phi## and ##\vec{A}## for any arbitrary field ##\chi## (check this!). That's the famous gauge invariance of Maxwell's electromagnetism.
 
  • #14
Note to OP. This
vanhees71 said:
The electromagnetic potentials ##\Phi## and ##\vec{A}## are not uniquely defined by the physical situation and thus are not observable fields in Maxwell's theory. The electromagnetic field ##(\vec{E},\vec{B})## are observables.

The potentials are introduced as "auxiliary" mathematical quantities to fulfill the homogeneous Maxwell equations identically, i.e., you set
$$\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}, \quad \vec{E}=-\partial_t \vec{A}/c -\vec{\nabla} \Phi.$$
Then indeed the two homogeneous Maxwell equations,
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}+\partial_t \vec{B}/c=0$$
are identically fulfilled (check this!).

But for given ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## also
$$\Phi'=\Phi+\partial_t \chi/c, \quad \vec{A}'=\vec{A}-\vec{\nabla} \chi$$
lead to the same ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## as ##\Phi## and ##\vec{A}## for any arbitrary field ##\chi## (check this!). That's the famous gauge invariance of Maxwell's electromagnetism.
is the same as this
Orodruin said:
Also, in the language of differential forms, where the 4-potential ##A## is a 1-form on spacetime containing both the scalar and vector potentials of electromagnetism, we have the field tensor ##F = dA##. Adding the differential of any spacetime function ##\phi## to ##A##, i.e., ##A' = A + d\phi## leaves the same field tensor ##F = dA' = dA + d^2 \phi = dA## as ##d^2 = 0##.
in different notation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #15
You can formulate Maxwell's electrodynamics entirely in the Cartan calculus. It's very elegant and modern but not so common. An interesting textbook, providing an axiomatic approach to classical electrodynamics, based on Cartan calculus is

F. W. Hehl, Y. N. Obukhov, Foundations of classical electrodynamics, Springer (2003)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K