Can the GCD of Polynomials in a Field Always Be Reduced to 1?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the greatest common divisor (gcd) of polynomials in a field, specifically whether the gcd of two polynomials can always be reduced to 1. The user demonstrates that if D(x) = gcd(p(x), q(x)), then D(x) divides both p(x) and q(x). By substituting and simplifying, they conclude that dividing by D(x) in a field leads to the equation 1 = k(x)m(x) + s(x)n(x), which implies gcd(m(x), n(x)) = 1. This establishes that the gcd of the polynomials can indeed be reduced to 1 under the given conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial algebra in F[x], where F is a field
  • Knowledge of the properties of gcd in the context of polynomials
  • Familiarity with the concept of fields in abstract algebra
  • Basic skills in algebraic manipulation and substitution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gcd in polynomial rings over fields
  • Learn about the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials
  • Explore the implications of polynomial division in fields
  • Investigate the relationship between gcd and irreducible polynomials
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians focusing on polynomial theory, and educators teaching concepts related to gcd in polynomial fields.

alexfresno
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We know that the gcd of two polynomials can be written as

gcd(p(x),q(x))=p(x)m(x) + q(x)n(x) for some n(x) and m(x) in F[x] F a fieldI want to show gcd(n(x),m(x))=1 for a fixed gcd(p(x),q(x))

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, what I tried was to let D(x)=gcd(p(x),q(x))
then D(x)|q(x) and D(x)|p(x). Which implies that q(x)=D(x)k(x) and p(x)=D(x)s(x) for some k(x),s(x) in F[x].

Then i got D(x)=D(x)k(x)m(x)+D(x)s(x)n(x) by substitution

Can I divide both sides by D(x) since we are in a Field? If i can...
then won't 1=k(x)m(x)+s(x)n(x) imply gcd(m(x),n(x))=1?? or there is a stronger proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your proof is correct!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K