Can the Hubble telescope measure the diameter of Betelgeuse?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hubble telescope can measure the diameter of Betelgeuse, which is 427 light-years away and has a diameter 800 times that of the Sun (1.39 x 106 km). The angular resolution of the Hubble telescope, determined by the Rayleigh Criterion, is 58 nRad. To successfully measure Betelgeuse's diameter, the angular diameter must exceed the telescope's angular resolution. If the angular diameter is too small, the star will appear indistinguishable from a point source, despite being in focus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular resolution and the Rayleigh Criterion
  • Familiarity with astronomical measurements and distances
  • Basic knowledge of telescopes and their functionalities
  • Concept of angular diameter in astronomy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Rayleigh Criterion in detail and its applications in astronomy
  • Learn about the Hubble Space Telescope's specifications and capabilities
  • Explore methods for measuring stellar diameters using telescopes
  • Investigate the concept of point sources in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the measurement techniques of celestial objects.

Decimal
Messages
73
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



The star Betelgeuse is 427 lightyears from earth. Betelgeuse has a diameter 800 times that of the sun, where the diameter of the sun equals ##1.39*10^6 km##. Given that Betelgeuse has an angular resolution given by the Rayleigh Criterion of 58 nRad, is it possible for the Hubble telescope to measure the diameter of Betelgeuse?

Homework Equations



Equation for angular resolution $$ \Delta\theta = \frac {1.22 \lambda} {D}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I am supposed to check whether the angular diameter of Betelgeuse is not less than the angular resolution of the telescope. However I don't really understand the theory behind this. I thought angular resolution had to do with the ability of the telescope to distinguish two objects with a certain angular separation. In this case there is only one object, so what am I trying to distinguish? What would I see through the telescope if the angular diameter is too small?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Decimal said:
I thought angular resolution had to do with the ability of the telescope to distinguish two objects with a certain angular separation. In this case there is only one object, so what am I trying to distinguish?
You want to measure the diameter, hence distinguish between the left side and the right side of the star.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Decimal
Okay, I understand. So if you were to look at a star that's too small for the angular resolution of the telescope, would it just be blurry and out of focus? Because you can't distinguish the two sides?
 
Decimal said:
would it just be blurry and out of focus
It would be in focus, but indistinguishable from the image from a point source.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Decimal
BvU said:
It would be in focus, but indistinguishable from the image from a point source.

Ah of course, I see now. Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K