Can the sinh and cosh functions be expressed in terms of each other?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores whether the hyperbolic sine (sinh) and hyperbolic cosine (cosh) functions can be expressed in terms of each other, similar to the relationships between sine and cosine. Participants examine various identities and properties of these functions, including their connections to imaginary numbers and other mathematical functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that just as sine can be expressed in terms of cosine, sinh might also be expressible in terms of cosh.
  • Another participant provides identities involving imaginary units, stating that sinh and cosh can be expressed as sinh(x) = -i cosh(x + πi/2) and cosh(x) = -i sinh(x + πi/2).
  • A participant questions the reliance on imaginary units, asking if there are identities that do not involve them.
  • One participant asserts that the nature of hyperbolic functions means they cannot be expressed without involving imaginary numbers, referencing the relationship sinh(x) = i sin(ix) and cosh(x) = cos(ix).
  • Another participant mentions the identity cosh²(x) - sinh²(x) = 1 as a possible rearrangement but expresses uncertainty about its relevance to the original question.
  • A later reply introduces the Gudermannian function as a related concept, though it is unclear how it directly addresses the original inquiry.
  • One participant notes that the graphs of sinh(x) and cosh(x) lack the shift property that sine and cosine have for real numbers.
  • A repeated mention of the identity cosh²(x) - sinh²(x) = 1 reinforces its significance in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether sinh and cosh can be expressed in terms of each other without involving imaginary units. Some propose identities that do involve imaginary numbers, while others seek real-number relationships, indicating a lack of consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' contributions depend on the definitions and properties of hyperbolic functions and their relationships to trigonometric functions, which may not be universally accepted or understood in the same way.

Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Is possible express the sine in terms of cosine and vice-versa:

##\sin(x) = \cos(x-\frac{\pi}{2})##

##\cos(x) = \sin(x+\frac{\pi}{2})##

So, of some way, is possible express the sinh in terms of cosh too and vice-versa?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sure

##
\sinh(x)=-\imath \, \cosh(x+\pi\,\imath/2)
\\
\cosh(x)=-\imath \, \sinh(x+\pi\,\imath/2)
##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
lurflurf said:
sure

##
\sinh(x)=-\imath \, \cosh(x+\pi\,\imath/2)
\\
\cosh(x)=-\imath \, \sinh(x+\pi\,\imath/2)
##

No exist an identity that no involve imaginary unit?
 
No, because that is the whole point of the hyperbolic functions: sinh(x)= i sin(ix) and cosh(x)= cos(ix).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Of course, there's the 'obvious' one which you can find by rearranging ##\cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x = 1##, but I don't think that's what you're going for, is it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Curious3141 said:
Of course, there's the 'obvious' one which you can find by rearranging ##\cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x = 1##, but I don't think that's what you're going for, is it?

no, but thanks
 
Considering the graphs of sinh(x) and cosh(x), they don't have the shift property that sin(x) and cos(x) have for x in set of real numbers.
 
cosh2(x) - sinh2(x) = 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K