Can Three Holes in a Tall Cylinder of Water Create a Hydrodynamic Coincidence?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of creating three intersecting streams of water from holes punched in the side of a tall cylinder filled with water. Participants explore the theoretical implications of fluid dynamics, particularly using Bernoulli's law, to assess whether such an intersection point can exist.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that to determine if the streams can intersect, one must derive the equations of motion for the water streams based on their heights and the principles of fluid dynamics.
  • The same participant concludes that for three holes to have a common intersection point, the height of the third hole must match either the first or second hole, suggesting that three distinct holes cannot achieve this intersection.
  • Another participant praises the analysis, indicating it aligns with a physicist's approach.
  • Some participants question whether a conical container could allow for a three-point intersection, suggesting that the original question might be interpreted differently.
  • There is a mention of the orientation of the cylinder, implying that the vertical alignment may not be a necessary condition for the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the conditions under which three streams can intersect, with some suggesting alternative configurations (like a conical container) while others maintain that the original setup does not permit it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of different container shapes.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the orientation of the cylinder and the definition of the problem may affect the conclusions drawn. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps or the implications of different configurations.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Given a comparatively tall cylinder full of water, is it possible to punch in its side three similar holes so that their streams all intersect at one point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is not possible!

In order to find if there is an intersection point we have to find the equations that describe the trajectories of its stream of water and demand that they have a common point.
Thus let one hole to live at height [itex]h[/itex] from the ground while the surface of the water in the cylinder lives at height [itex]H[/itex] (at some instance of time). Furthermore we assume that the velocity of the surface is negligible with respect to the velocity of the water leaving from the hole. Then from Bernoulli's law we have

[tex]\rho\,g\,H=\frac{1}{2}\,\rho\,v^2+\rho\,g\,h\Rightarrow v^2=2\,g\,(H-h)[/tex]​

When the water leaves the hole it feels only its weight, so the equations of motion are


[tex]\left\{\begin{array}{l}x=v\cdot t\\ y=h-\frac{1}{2}\,g\,t^2\end{array}\Rightarrow y=h-\frac{g}{2\,v^2}\,x^2\Rightarrow y=h-\frac{x^2}{4\,(H-h)} \quad (1)[/tex]

I choosed my coordinate system having its origin at the bottom corner of the cylinder, right below the holes.
Now take the first two holes living at heights [itex]h_1,\,h_2[/itex] respectively. In order the trajectories to have a common point they must both fulfill equation (1) for some coordinates [tex](x_o>0,y_o>0)[/tex], i.e.


[tex]\left{\begin{array}{l} y_o=h_1-\frac{x_o^2}{4\,(H-h_1)}\\y_o=h_2-\frac{x_o^2}{4\,(H-h_2)}\end{array}\Rightarrow \left\{\begin{array}{l}x_o=2\,\sqrt{(H-h_1)(H-h_2)} \\ y_o=h_1+h_2-H \end{array}[/tex]

Now for the 3rd hole in height [tex]h_3[/tex] equation (1) merely defines [tex]h_3[/tex] if we plug in it the above values of [tex](x_o,y_o)[/tex]. Thus we arrive to


[tex]y_o=h_3-\frac{x_o^2}{4\,(H-h_3)}\Rightarrow \frac{(h_3-h_1)(h_3-h_2)}{H-h_3}=0\Rightarrow h_3=h_1 \quad \text{or} \quad h_3=h_2[/tex]

Thus the 3rd hole must be identified with the 1st or the 2nd hole, which means that we can't have three holes with a common intersetion point for their streams.
 
Rainbow Child,

Solved like a true physicist!
 
Very nice :biggrin:

Could you achieve the 'three-point intersection' with a conical container though?
 
Yes, but only by nit-picking your question way beyond your intention.
 
For example, he never said the cylinder had to be oriented vertically...
 
TVP45 said:
Yes, but only by nit-picking your question way beyond your intention.

Sorry, I messed up the quote feature again. I was replying to the OP, not dst.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
712
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K