Can Time Travel Reveal Tasks Before Completion?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical implications of time travel and task completion. It proposes a scenario where multiple individuals are sent into the future at staggered intervals to determine if a task has been completed. The key conclusion is that while each individual waits only one minute to confirm the task's completion, the sequential nature of their time travel means that the total wait time remains ten minutes. This highlights the complexities of time travel and the non-linear perception of time in such scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts related to time travel
  • Familiarity with theoretical frameworks of causality
  • Knowledge of sequential processes and their implications in time-based scenarios
  • Ability to conceptualize multi-dimensional time theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of time travel in physics, focusing on theories by physicists like Kip Thorne
  • Explore the concept of causality and its relation to time travel in theoretical physics
  • Study the philosophical implications of time travel, particularly in relation to free will and determinism
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of time travel scenarios using tools like MATLAB or Python
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, philosophers, and science fiction writers interested in the theoretical aspects of time travel and its implications on task completion and causality.

mgsully
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
About Me: I am not a physics student, but I do have a physics question.

Question: The question is, assuming it is possible to travel into the future: could it be possible to learn whether a task performed in the future had occurred before it had been performed?

Theory:
You are capable of sending a person ten minutes into the future to perform a given task. Normally you would have to wait ten minutes to see whether or not that task had been performed, right? However, if at the exact same time you sent a second person into the future, only this time it was nine minutes. When the second person saw that the task had been completed, they were to raise a flag above their head. The second person sent nine minutes would only have to wait one minute to see if the task had been completed and thus, we would only have to wait nine minutes to see if the second person sent had confirmed that the task done by the person sent one minute farther into the future had been done.

Carrying this onward, let's send another person eight minutes into the future, and a forth seven minutes, and so on. With ten people sent into the future, each a minute apart, but each sent at the exact same time. Would not each person be waiting the same, single minute to see what the person sent one minute farther in time was doing? Therefor, would we only have to wait one minute to see if the person sent one minute into the future had a flag raised over there head, since they only waited the same, single minute to see if the person sent one minute farther into the future had done the same, and so on?

Theoretically, we could learn shortly after one minute whether or not a task performed nine minutes later had been completed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mgsully said:
The second person sent nine minutes would only have to wait one minute to see if the task had been completed and thus, we would only have to wait nine minutes to see if the second person sent had confirmed that the task done by the person sent one minute farther into the future had been done.

This is where your mistake is. You forgot to add the 1-minute.
Thus, 9+1=10
 
Yeah, it later occurred to me that even though they were each only waiting one minute, and waiting that one minute at the exact same time, that they were different minutes - each sequentially spread apart, consecutively across a ten minute period of time...

Thank though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K