MHB Can triangles with the same side lengths have different angles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter akarikairi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
AI Thread Summary
Triangles with the same side lengths are congruent, meaning they cannot have different angles. The discussion centers on triangle △ABC with side lengths 4, 4, and 7, which adheres to the Side-Side-Side (SSS) congruence criterion. Since congruent triangles have corresponding angles that are equal, no other triangle can exist with the same side lengths but different angles. Visual representations may aid understanding, but the underlying geometric principles confirm the conclusion. Therefore, triangles with identical side lengths must have identical angles.
akarikairi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
△ABC has side lengths 4, 4, and 7.
Is there another triangle with the same side lengths but different angles?

I get a lot of questions like these, and I don't know how to judge whether or not they are true or false. Drawing them on paper doesn't always help me either, but I do try to - to get a visual representation of the questions.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi akarikairi,

If there was another triangle with the same side lengths, then by SSS the two triangles would be congruent. Then by CPCTC the corresponding angles are congruent. So there is no triangle with the same side lengths as ABC but with different angles.
 
Thank you for the explanation! This is very helpful.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top