Can Unification of Forces Coexist with an Eternally Inflating Universe?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ranku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    inflation unification
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the compatibility of the unification of gravitation with the other three fundamental forces and the concept of an eternally existing self-replicating inflationary universe, as proposed by Linde. Participants explore whether a finite beginning is necessary for such unification or if an infinite origin is possible.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question if the unification of forces requires a finite beginning to the universe, while others suggest that there is no inherent incompatibility between these ideas.
  • It is noted that eternal inflation does not avoid the initial singularity, prompting requests for elaboration on this point.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of references provided, particularly when the same authors are involved, leading to skepticism about the consensus among cosmologists.
  • Some participants advocate for withholding judgment on the nature of inflation until the merits of various arguments can be understood, emphasizing the importance of consensus and experimental confirmation.
  • References to prominent figures in cosmology, such as Alex Vilenkin and Alan Guth, are made, with acknowledgment of dissenting voices like Susskind and Aguirre.
  • Questions arise regarding the implications of Linde's statements about the global geometry of an eternally inflating universe and its relation to finite inflation, including inquiries about the dynamics described by the Friedmann equation.
  • There is a suggestion that eternal inflation may be eternal in at least one direction of time, with some arguing it could be both.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the compatibility of unification and eternal inflation, with no consensus reached. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of eternal inflation and its relationship to initial singularities.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for further exploration of the arguments surrounding eternal inflation and its implications, as well as the potential for experimental confirmation of claims related to the nature of inflation.

Ranku
Messages
434
Reaction score
18
Is the possibility of unification of gravitation with the other three fundamental forces compatible with the idea of an 'eternally existing self-replicating inflationary universe' as proposed by Linde? In other words, for unification of the four fundamental forces, is it necessary for the universe to have a finite beginning, or can it have an 'infinite' origin?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Ranku said:
Is the possibility of unification of gravitation with the other three fundamental forces compatible with the idea of an 'eternally existing self-replicating inflationary universe' as proposed by Linde? In other words, for unification of the four fundamental forces, is it necessary for the universe to have a finite beginning, or can it have an 'infinite' origin?
I don't think there's any reason to suspect that these ideas are incompatible, no. Especially as the precise way in which gravity and quantum mechanics can be reconciled isn't yet known.
 
It's also worth pointing out that eternal inflation does not avoid the initial singularity.
 
bapowell said:
eternal inflation does not avoid the initial singularity

Can you elaborate?
 
Bapowell, I notice both papers are by the same authors, something that always makes me suspicious.
I am not qualified to assess the validity of the argument, so I generally look to see if other cosmologists agree and it seem they don't agree
https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0571
https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.5385
i doubt there is any to test between the two notions, but happy to be proven wrong.
 
Well, we need to do more than just find dissenting viewpoints. Rather than assume that inflation is past-eternal until proven otherwise, why not withhold judgement either way until you can understand the merits of the various arguments?

Thanks for posting the references: I'll try to have a look this weekend and determine where the disagreement lies.

For what it's worth, and not to blindly appeal to authority, but Alex Vilenkin and Alan Guth are two of the original architects of quantum cosmology and inflation theory and have generally well-reasoned arguments. We'll see if they withstand the challenge.
 
I agree. My thinking when assessing these things, is if a theorist claims something and I am not in a position to assess if they are right i can ask two questions
1) is there a consensus amongst other theorists ? are the dissenters respected int the field?
2) is there a way to experimentally confirm their statements?
I know Guth and Vilenkin are big names in the field but Susskind and Aguirre are also quite well respected, are they not?
heres another dissenter
http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5550
I look forward to your comments and Yes I do withhold judgement. On the second point, I think we would be very lucky to find some direct probe of eternal inflation happening maybe something like bubble collisions or some other means, but even in such an optimistic scenario how we could test the claim that it not past eternal?
 
In the paper "Eternally Existing..." Linde says: "its (eternally inflating universe) global geometry has nothing in common neither with the geometry of an open or flat homogeneous universe with a gradually decreasing energy density, nor with the geometry of a closed universe.." Also: "There may exist an initial global singular spacelike hypersurface. In this case the universe as a whole emerges from a state with a Planck density ρ ~ MP4 at some moment t = tP at which it becomes possible to speak about the universe in terms of classical spacetime."

So what does this mean in terms of the similarity and difference between eternal inflation and finite inflation, apart from the rolling potential in the latter? For instance, is the dynamics of eternal inflation described by the Friedmann equation?
 
  • #10
Mu impression is that eternal inflation is eternal in at least one direction of time, not necessarily both, although some have argued it is both, see above posts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K