Can We Determine a Complex Function from Its Poles Alone?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether a complex function can be determined solely from its poles. Participants explore the implications of having simple poles on the complex plane and the potential forms of the function based on these poles. The scope includes theoretical aspects of complex analysis and the application of specific theorems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that knowing the poles allows for a function of the form H(x) + Σ(c_n/(z-z_n)^{k_n}), where H is analytic, but does not provide a definitive method to reconstruct f(z).
  • Another participant notes that functions like 2*f(z) or z*f(z) share the same poles, indicating that multiple functions can correspond to the same set of poles.
  • A participant references Mittag-Leffler's theorem and discusses a specific case where poles follow a harmonic series, raising the complexity of the resulting function.
  • One participant proposes evaluating a function defined by a series involving its poles, questioning the existence of an analytical method to compute such sums.
  • Another participant mentions that certain sums can yield analytic results and suggests modifying the original sum to achieve a similar form.
  • A later reply cites results from complex analysis literature, providing examples of sums that lead to known functions, which may inspire further exploration.
  • References to the Basel problem and Weierstrass factorization theorem are made as potentially relevant topics for further investigation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the ability to determine a function from its poles, with some suggesting possible forms and others indicating the complexity and ambiguity involved. No consensus is reached regarding a definitive method or conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of functions resulting from specific arrangements of poles and the limitations of existing methods to analytically derive these functions. The discussion highlights the dependence on the nature of the poles and the potential for multiple valid functions.

gonadas91
Messages
75
Reaction score
5
Suppose we have a complex function [tex]f(z)[/tex] with simple poles on the complex plane, and we know exactly where these poles are located (but we don't know how the function depends on z) Is there any way to build up the exact form of [tex]f(z)[/tex] just from its poles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gonadas91 said:
Suppose we have a complex function [tex]f(z)[/tex] with simple poles on the complex plane, and we know exactly where these poles are located (but we don't know how the function depends on z) Is there any way to build up the exact form of [tex]f(z)[/tex] just from its poles?
No. You can conclude that the function is of the form [itex]H(x)+\sum_{n}\frac{c_{n}}{(z-z_{n})^{k_{n}}}[/itex], where H is analytic, zn are the poles and the cn and kn are constants (the kn are positive integers).
 
For every function f(z), 2*f(z), z*f(z) and so on have the same poles (the last one assuming 0 is not a pole).
 
Yes, thanks for both replies, I think the first one is related with Mittag Leffers theorem, the poles I am talking about follow a law, for example, a harmonic series on the real axis. But the sum over all this poles gives a complicated function the complex plane. To be clear, I am trying to evaluate a function of the type: [tex]f(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{z-z_{n}}[/tex] where the zn poles can follow a law, for example [tex]z_{n}=A*(n+\frac{1}{2})^{2}[/tex] where A is constant. The problem is that the series depending on these poles can give as a result really complicated functions of z, I just wanted to know if there is an analytical way to carry out these sums.
 
Some poles will match (e. g. n=1, n=-2).

A sum like$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{1+(n+c)^2}$$ should have an analytic result, and you can modify your sum to have that shape.
 
Thats actually what I have done, and yes it has to have an analytical form, I was just wondering about an analytical method to arrive at it, rather than using Mathematica, just to know if there exist a general method or something, many thanks for the replies
 
Picked up my trusty Ahlfors (Complex analysis) and he shows that [itex]\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(z-n)^{2}}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{\sin^{2}\pi z}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{1}{z}+\sum_{n\neq 0}(\frac{1}{z-n}+\frac{1}{n})=\pi\cot(\pi z)[/itex]. Might give you some ideas.
 
Many thanks for the replies!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K