Can we now explain the Fine Structure Constant?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RobbyQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Structure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Fine Structure Constant, approximately valued at 1/137, and its relationship to absolute zero as proposed by Hans Bethe in his 1931 paper. Despite the intriguing connection, the consensus is that a definitive explanation for the value of the Fine Structure Constant remains elusive. The equation relating absolute zero, denoted as T0 = (1 - 2/α), where α represents the Fine Structure Constant, has been tested and confirmed to work on calculators, although the publication of this finding was eventually withdrawn.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fine Structure Constant (α)
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics, specifically absolute zero (T0)
  • Familiarity with scientific publication processes and retractions
  • Basic mathematical skills for equation testing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Fine Structure Constant in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Hans Bethe's contributions to physics and his published works
  • Investigate the significance of absolute zero in thermodynamics
  • Learn about the process and reasons behind scientific paper retractions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the theoretical implications of fundamental constants in physics.

RobbyQ
Messages
32
Reaction score
11
In this video Dirac talks about the Fine Structure Constant 1/137.
Can we now explain why this is?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
But Hans Bethe wrote a paper showing that it was related to absolute zero $$ T_0=(1-\frac 2 \alpha )$$ where ## T_0## is absolute zero in Celsius and alpha the fine structure constant (G. Beck, H. Bethe & W. Riezler 1931: Naturwissenschaften 19, 39.)
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: mattt and Demystifier
He was making fun of Eddington. Pissed some people off. He was a tremendously interesting fellow...perhaps the most interesting I ever met. But the publication did finally get formally withdrawn.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Demystifier
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Quantum_Physics123 said:
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
It works, but that’s what makes it a good joke.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K