Can we now explain the Fine Structure Constant?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RobbyQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Structure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fine Structure Constant, specifically its value of approximately 1/137 and whether it can be explained. Participants explore historical references, mathematical relationships, and the implications of these ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Historical, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Fine Structure Constant cannot be explained as 1/137.
  • Others reference a paper by Hans Bethe that suggests a relationship between the Fine Structure Constant and absolute zero, specifically $$ T_0=(1-\frac 2 \alpha )$$.
  • A participant mentions that Bethe's publication was eventually withdrawn, indicating controversy surrounding the claim.
  • Multiple participants report testing the equation related to Bethe's claim, with one noting that while it works, it is perceived as a joke.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether the Fine Structure Constant can be explained, with some supporting the idea of a mathematical relationship while others maintain that no explanation exists.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to historical context and the withdrawal of a publication, which may affect the credibility of the claims made. There is also ambiguity regarding the interpretation of the equation and its implications.

RobbyQ
Messages
32
Reaction score
11
In this video Dirac talks about the Fine Structure Constant 1/137.
Can we now explain why this is?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
But Hans Bethe wrote a paper showing that it was related to absolute zero $$ T_0=(1-\frac 2 \alpha )$$ where ## T_0## is absolute zero in Celsius and alpha the fine structure constant (G. Beck, H. Bethe & W. Riezler 1931: Naturwissenschaften 19, 39.)
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: mattt and Demystifier
He was making fun of Eddington. Pissed some people off. He was a tremendously interesting fellow...perhaps the most interesting I ever met. But the publication did finally get formally withdrawn.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Demystifier
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
 
Reply
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Quantum_Physics123 said:
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
It works, but that’s what makes it a good joke.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Demystifier

Similar threads

Undergrad Fine Structure Constant - 10 steps
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Undergrad Role of Fine Structure Constant in Q.E.D.?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Graduate Feynman loop diagrams and Dyson series for anomalous magnetic moment
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
5K
Undergrad Calculating the fine structure constant in Feynman diagrams
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Is the fine structure constant the biggest myth ever?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Undergrad Chunks of action smaller than Planck's constant
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
High School Alpha is 1/137th of what? (Fine Structure Constant)
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Undergrad Fine Structure Spectra: Understanding Electron Intrinsic Spin Effects
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Shahar Hod's bound on the fine-structure constant
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Graduate Fine structure constant and energy scale
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K