I Can we now explain the Fine Structure Constant?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter RobbyQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Structure
RobbyQ
Messages
28
Reaction score
11
In this video Dirac talks about the Fine Structure Constant 1/137.
Can we now explain why this is?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
But Hans Bethe wrote a paper showing that it was related to absolute zero $$ T_0=(1-\frac 2 \alpha )$$ where ## T_0## is absolute zero in Celsius and alpha the fine structure constant (G. Beck, H. Bethe & W. Riezler 1931: Naturwissenschaften 19, 39.)
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes mattt and Demystifier
He was making fun of Eddington. Pissed some people off. He was a tremendously interesting fellow...perhaps the most interesting I ever met. But the publication did finally get formally withdrawn.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Demystifier
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
 
Reply
  • Wow
Likes Demystifier
Quantum_Physics123 said:
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
It works, but that’s what makes it a good joke.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Demystifier

Thread 'Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
View full post »

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'Is a table levitating possible, even at a minuscule probability?'

I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Fine Structure Constant - 10 steps
Replies
4
Views
1K
A Feynman loop diagrams and Dyson series for anomalous magnetic moment
2
Replies
80
Views
5K
I Role of Fine Structure Constant in Q.E.D.?
Replies
8
Views
1K
I Calculating the fine structure constant in Feynman diagrams
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Chunks of action smaller than Planck's constant
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Is the fine structure constant the biggest myth ever?
Replies
7
Views
3K
B Alpha is 1/137th of what? (Fine Structure Constant)
Replies
8
Views
4K
A Shahar Hod's bound on the fine-structure constant
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Fine Structure Spectra: Understanding Electron Intrinsic Spin Effects
Replies
2
Views
1K
B The average value of S operator
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top