I Can we now explain the Fine Structure Constant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RobbyQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Structure
Click For Summary
The Fine Structure Constant, approximately 1/137, remains unexplained despite its significance in physics. Hans Bethe's 1931 paper humorously linked it to absolute zero, suggesting a relationship that has intrigued many. Although the publication was later withdrawn, the equation derived from it has been tested and found to work. The discussion highlights Bethe's unique personality and the controversy surrounding his ideas. Ultimately, the connection between the Fine Structure Constant and absolute zero remains a topic of interest and amusement in the scientific community.
RobbyQ
Messages
32
Reaction score
11
In this video Dirac talks about the Fine Structure Constant 1/137.
Can we now explain why this is?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
But Hans Bethe wrote a paper showing that it was related to absolute zero $$ T_0=(1-\frac 2 \alpha )$$ where ## T_0## is absolute zero in Celsius and alpha the fine structure constant (G. Beck, H. Bethe & W. Riezler 1931: Naturwissenschaften 19, 39.)
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes mattt and Demystifier
He was making fun of Eddington. Pissed some people off. He was a tremendously interesting fellow...perhaps the most interesting I ever met. But the publication did finally get formally withdrawn.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Demystifier
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
 
Reply
  • Wow
Likes Demystifier
Quantum_Physics123 said:
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
It works, but that’s what makes it a good joke.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Demystifier

Thread 'Angular Momentum Vector and Its Magnitude'

For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Fine Structure Constant - 10 steps
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
A Feynman loop diagrams and Dyson series for anomalous magnetic moment
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
5K
I Role of Fine Structure Constant in Q.E.D.?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Calculating the fine structure constant in Feynman diagrams
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Chunks of action smaller than Planck's constant
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Is the fine structure constant the biggest myth ever?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
B Alpha is 1/137th of what? (Fine Structure Constant)
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
A Shahar Hod's bound on the fine-structure constant
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Fine Structure Spectra: Understanding Electron Intrinsic Spin Effects
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
B The average value of S operator
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K