Can we say N is strictly a subset of P(N)?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AATroop
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
AATroop
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
Essentially, do we know [itex]\mathbb{N}[/itex][itex]\subset[/itex][itex]{P}\mathbb{(N)}[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A lot depends on your definition of [itex]\mathbb{N}[/itex]. But if we take the usual set theoretic definition, then the inclusion is indeed true.

What is the set theoretic definition of [itex]\mathbb{N}[/itex]? It goes as follows:

  • Define [itex]0=\emptyset[/itex]
  • If [itex]0,...,n[/itex] are defined, then define [itex]n+1=\{0,...,n\}[/itex]
  • Define [itex]\mathbb{N}=\{0,1,2,...\}[/itex]

Now we can check that [itex]\mathbb{N}\subseteq \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})[/itex]. First of all, [itex]\emptyset[/itex] is a subset of [itex]\mathbb{N}[/itex] and thus [itex]\emptyset\in \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})[/itex]. Furthermore, [itex]\{0,...,n\}[/itex] is a subset of [itex]\mathbb{N}[/itex], and thus [itex]n+1=\{0,...,n\}\in \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})[/itex].
This shows that [itex]\mathbb{N}\subseteq \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})[/itex]. The inclusion is strict since [itex]\{2\}[/itex] is a subset of [itex]\mathbb{N}[/itex], but not an element.