Can Winged Humanoids Realistically Exist on Other Planets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bab5space
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of winged humanoids existing on other planets, exploring various environmental conditions, biological adaptations, and theoretical scenarios. Participants examine the implications of gravity, atmosphere, and evolutionary processes on the possibility of such life forms, drawing from both scientific principles and speculative fiction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Speculative fiction

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the square-cube principle makes the existence of winged humanoids unlikely, as weight increases faster than strength.
  • Others propose that lower gravity and a thick atmosphere could allow for winged humanoids, citing Titan as an example, but raise concerns about extreme cold and atmospheric retention.
  • A few participants suggest that moving Titan-like worlds closer to the sun could lead to atmospheric loss, questioning the viability of such environments for life.
  • Some explore the idea of terraforming planets with heavy gases like sulfur dioxide or sulfur hexafluoride, though they acknowledge the toxicity of such environments for Earth life.
  • One participant references a fictional scenario where winged humanoids exist on Ceres, genetically engineered to thrive in a controlled atmosphere.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of "humanoid," with some questioning whether a flying humanoid must have a specific limb structure or could evolve differently in a new environment.
  • Some participants highlight the potential for a planet the size of Mars to maintain a thicker atmosphere than Earth’s, suggesting that a protective magnetic field could enhance atmospheric retention.
  • Others challenge the square-cube principle by referencing historical large animals like Quetzalcoatlus, suggesting that denser atmospheres could support larger flying creatures.
  • There is a debate about the mechanics of flight, with some noting that many birds rely on gliding rather than flapping for sustained flight.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the feasibility of winged humanoids on other planets. Participants express differing opinions on the implications of the square-cube principle, the potential for terraforming, and the biological adaptations necessary for survival in alien environments. No consensus is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the effects of gravity and atmospheric conditions on the evolution of humanoid forms. There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of "humanoid" and the mechanics of flight in different environments. The discussion also touches on speculative scenarios that may not align with current scientific understanding.

Bab5space
Messages
111
Reaction score
13
Winged humanoids are popular in scifi, but due to the square cube principle (weight increases faster than strength), it's a nonstarter.

I have seen people say... but what if their world is lower gravity with a thick atmosphere?

A few challenges there that I am not sure can be overcome.

1. The moon Titan is such a place, yet I have read that the reason it's dense gases do not boil off and evaporate into space is because it is so far away from the sun. So sure, people could fly there... and get frost bite in minutes or less... even if air was breathable there.

2. Moving a Titan-like world closer to the sun to improve the frigid temperatures I have read would make the gases evaporate away into vacuum, since the gravity of Titan is rather low anyway. I do not know if this is true, but I suspect it is, since our moon is larger than Titan and is not holding an atmosphere, likely because it could'nt, unless the gases in question were the heaviest you could find so they would hold more readily to the surfaceThat's one planet type that likely could not host Earth life and exist. Anymore you got? Or want to discuss?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm
Physics news on Phys.org
Bab5space said:
Winged humanoids are popular in scifi, but due to the square cube principle (weight increases faster than strength), it's a nonstarter.

I have seen people say... but what if their world is lower gravity with a thick atmosphere?

A few challenges there that I am not sure can be overcome.

1. The moon Titan is such a place, yet I have read that the reason it's dense gases do not boil off and evaporate into space is because it is so far away from the sun. So sure, people could fly there... and get frost bite in minutes or less... even if air was breathable there.

2. Moving a Titan-like world closer to the sun to improve the frigid temperatures I have read would make the gases evaporate away into vacuum, since the gravity of Titan is rather low anyway. I do not know if this is true, but I suspect it is, since our moon is larger than Titan and is not holding an atmosphere, likely because it could'nt, unless the gases in question were the heaviest you could find so they would hold more readily to the surfaceThat's one planet type that likely could not host Earth life and exist. Anymore you got? Or want to discuss?
You could search for solutions containing sulfur dioxide near critical point. Heavy and viscous. World like mini-Venus in binary system which preferentially lost carbon dioxide during red giant phase of one of stars. Still too toxic for human proper, although room temperatures are plausible.

In more controlled environment, you can try fly humans in sulfur hexafluoride atmosphere. It may be used to terraform some small and and very cold planets - down to size of Moon orbiting at asteroid belt-like insolation..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm
trurle said:
You could search for solutions containing sulfur dioxide near critical point. Heavy and viscous. World like mini-Venus in binary system which preferentially lost carbon dioxide during red giant phase of one of stars. Still too toxic for human proper, although room temperatures are plausible.

In more controlled environment, you can try fly humans in sulfur hexafluoride atmosphere. It may be used to terraform some small and and very cold planets - down to size of Moon orbiting at asteroid belt-like insolation..
What you get lifeform wise would likely breath stuff that we cannot breath, and eat plants and lifeforms we would also find toxic.

You know what the subtle truth about terraforming is?

Destroy the natural surroundings to make it livable for a lifeform. Since something must be substituted otherwise the lifeform cannot live, so it cannibilizes resources of the host world and bends them to host it's life, at the expense of the natural order.

Ethics come into play if someone is actually living there.

Since alien terraforming on an inhabited world is lethal to natives. One thing this movie was accurate on via science.

 
Bab5space said:
Winged humanoids are popular in scifi, but due to the square cube principle (weight increases faster than strength), it's a nonstarter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quetzalcoatlus You are ignoring pterosaurs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm, DrStupid and Rubidium_71
I read a story a couple years ago that featured winged humanoids on several worlds of our Solar System. The best example I can remember is Ceres, the characters in the story had constructed a shell around Ceres and thawed it out over time. The result was a mostly water-covered core with a few islands. Some of these islands were inhabited, the rest of the population lived on the inside of the sphere. Since the thicker atmosphere was protected by the shell, the humanoids (who were genetically engineered specifically for life on Ceres) could easily fly around from place to place. Here's a link for anyone that is curious:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B074SZVSMY/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Mars now has a thin atmosphere. But look at the river valleys. Mars had enough warmth and dense air for flowing rivers for hundreds of millions of years. Imagine a planet like young Mars, or only slightly more massive, and you could have atmosphere denser than Earth.
What is "humanoid"? Pterosaurs are bigger than humans, but quadrupeds.
Does a flying "humanoid" have to be a hexapod, with four limbs attached to shoulder girdle?
How are bones, joints, muscles and tendons arranged in angel shoulders? Like, transmitting the downstroke forces?
 
A planet the size of Mars could have a thicker atmosphere than Earth's.
If you want it to last longer, give it a protective magnetic field by adding more uranium to keep the core liquid.
 
snorkack said:
What is "humanoid"? Pterosaurs are bigger than humans, but quadrupeds.
Does a flying "humanoid" have to be a hexapod, with four limbs attached to shoulder girdle?
How are bones, joints, muscles and tendons arranged in angel shoulders? Like, transmitting the downstroke forces?
Well, humanoid is what you get after a few generations of people have lived and bred on another world. They would adapt over time to the new gravity, atmospheric pressure, etc until they were no longer an Earthly human. Once adapted to a low gravity environment it's doubtful they could even safely return to Earth. The story I referenced gets around the slow process of evolution by genetically engineering people for a specific environment like Ceres.
The inhabitants in the story do indeed have six limbs but they still walk upright. The description sounded more like bat wings than "angel" or bird-like wings. As I remember, the author didn't go into fine detail on the exact physics of how they flew, (it's been a while since I read it, so I could be wrong) but that's sci fi for you. :)
 
I'm confused why you think such a thing is a nonstarter because of the square cube principal. There have been animals on this planet that were much much bigger than humans. Quetzalcoatlus is thought to have weighed close to a thousand pounds. The air density at the time was likely very similar to todays, the difference was that there was way more oxygen in the air. Oxygen is energy rich, so it was the extra energy that allowed muscles to get so big and strong.

It's possible to have a much denser atmosphere and still be close to the sun. Venus' atmosphere is 90 times as dense as Earths and it's both a smaller planet (slightly) and closer to the sun.

You also have to remember that most animals to not do the majority of their flying by flapping their wings, or are even capable of taking off vertically. I'm 100% sure that a swan can not just take off, it has to have a running start. Their wings are aerofoils, 99% of most birds "flight" is actually a glide. Lots of birds can lock their wings in place and ride updrafts. That's how they're able to fly thousands of miles without stopping to each every five minutes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm and Keith_McClary
  • #10
newjerseyrunner said:
I'm confused why you think such a thing is a nonstarter because of the square cube principal. There have been animals on this planet that were much much bigger than humans. Quetzalcoatlus is thought to have weighed close to a thousand pounds. The air density at the time was likely very similar to todays, the difference was that there was way more oxygen in the air. Oxygen is energy rich, so it was the extra energy that allowed muscles to get so big and strong.

It's possible to have a much denser atmosphere and still be close to the sun. Venus' atmosphere is 90 times as dense as Earths and it's both a smaller planet (slightly) and closer to the sun.

You also have to remember that most animals to not do the majority of their flying by flapping their wings, or are even capable of taking off vertically. I'm 100% sure that a swan can not just take off, it has to have a running start. Their wings are aerofoils, 99% of most birds "flight" is actually a glide. Lots of birds can lock their wings in place and ride updrafts. That's how they're able to fly thousands of miles without stopping to each every five minutes.

Venus worlds is too hot for anything winged to survive... that's wh happes with dense gases near the sun.

Titan is too cold for anything winged to live, and were it closer, the vape effect, which Venus avoids with dense gases and greater gravity than Titan yields.

Greater oxygen in the air creates a whole bunch of things all at once (easier to blow up and combust stuff) as will as easier for metals and other items to oxidize (rust).

Besides that, great wingspan is required based on hunanoid mass or greater, it woukd dwarf theperson so much that they would not fit the stereotupe fantasy that people want.

You can still do it, but don't expect them to fly for long if at all looming like s stereotype
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
9K