Can Science Fiction Inspire Real Astrophysical Discoveries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTOM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the plausibility of various science fiction scenarios related to astrophysical phenomena, including planetary formations, orbital dynamics in multi-star systems, and the potential for life on extreme environments. The scope includes theoretical considerations, speculative models, and imaginative concepts drawn from science fiction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose the existence of a dense asteroid storm, suggesting it could occur after a collision of larger bodies, but express uncertainty about the duration of such a phenomenon.
  • Questions are raised about the feasibility of a planet maintaining a stable, non-eccentric orbit around binary stars, with references to existing literature on circumbinary planets.
  • Discussion includes the chaotic orbits of planets in a three-star system, with a mention of the limitations of current analytic techniques in predicting such orbits.
  • Speculation about a habitable storm planet includes the idea that advanced civilizations might build underground structures to survive extreme weather, though concerns are raised about the evolutionary implications of such adaptations.
  • Floating rocks are discussed in terms of buoyancy and atmospheric density, with participants questioning the conditions necessary for rocks to float in a dense atmosphere.
  • The concept of a once habitable world being destroyed by a cosmic catastrophe is examined, with references to historical events like the extinction of the dinosaurs due to asteroid impacts.
  • Some participants suggest that a rapid cosmic event, such as a star explosion, could lead to immediate destruction of a planet, raising questions about the nature of such catastrophic events.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the plausibility of the scenarios discussed, with no clear consensus on any single idea. Multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the conversation.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on assumptions about the nature of planetary formation and the conditions necessary for life, which are not universally accepted. The discussion also highlights the limitations of current scientific understanding regarding complex orbital dynamics and the effects of extreme environmental conditions.

GTOM
Messages
982
Reaction score
68
In Sf, we can regularly see planets and other places that are very different from what we see on Earth, or even in the solar system.

How plausible are the following ones?

- Dense asteroid storm. Maybe a new planet is forming, or a giant comet recently shattered? Can such thing exist in a Lagrange point for prolonged time?

- Tatooine. Can theoritecally a planet have a relatively stabile, not very eccentric orbit around binary stars?

- Three stars system like in Three Body Problem. As far as i know, real Alpha Centaury isn't like that since the third star is very distant. Does the real planet (planets?) have a very chaotic orbit?

- (habitable) Storm planet. Maybe it is a moon of a giant planet, and tidal forces regularly create very strong winds, inhabitants has to burrow underground structures?

- Floating rocks. Real rocks exist that float on water due to lots of gas bubbles. Could they float in very dense atmosphere?

- Once habitable world destroyed by a cosmic catastrophe in a relatively short time? (Not in millions of years)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GTOM said:
Can theoritecally a planet have a relatively stabile, not very eccentric orbit around binary stars?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumbinary_planet

GTOM said:
Storm planet

Neptune.

GTOM said:
Three stars system like in Three Body Problem.

The three body problem doesn't say these orbits are impossible. It says they are impossible to calculate using present analytic techniques.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GTOM
Check the writings of Phillip Jose Farmer. He invented several bizarre planets and made them entertaining.
 
GTOM said:
In Sf, we can regularly see planets and other places that are very different from what we see on Earth, or even in the solar system.

How plausible are the following ones?

- Dense asteroid storm. Maybe a new planet is forming, or a giant comet recently shattered? Can such thing exist in a Lagrange point for prolonged time?

- Tatooine. Can theoritecally a planet have a relatively stabile, not very eccentric orbit around binary stars?

- Three stars system like in Three Body Problem. As far as i know, real Alpha Centaury isn't like that since the third star is very distant. Does the real planet (planets?) have a very chaotic orbit?

- (habitable) Storm planet. Maybe it is a moon of a giant planet, and tidal forces regularly create very strong winds, inhabitants has to burrow underground structures?

- Floating rocks. Real rocks exist that float on water due to lots of gas bubbles. Could they float in very dense atmosphere?

- Once habitable world destroyed by a cosmic catastrophe in a relatively short time? (Not in millions of years)

Asteroid storm: I would say its possible in the short term, say after a collision of larger bodies, but the density of mass would diffuse into the vacuum of space, I have no idea what the time frames would be.

Habitable storm planet: I think an advanced civilization realizing their planet is about to turn into a storm planet might be able to build underground to evade, but I don't know if it would work if it always had destructive storms, I guess depends on how bad. But the life on this planet would have had to survive without technology in the early stage of evolution on that planet, I think this is less likely as single cell organisms (ie the start of life here) would be a bit more vulnerable to destruction. Basically a chicken and the egg argument, if you need to build underground to survive, how did you evolve to be able to do that in the first place?

Floating rocks: Buoyancy is simply a ratio of densities (as long as there is some acceleration acting on them), if you have a gas dense enough rocks will float. The highest density gas we have (according to google at room temp and 1atm) is Tungsten hexaflouride, this has a density of 12.4g/l, or 0.0124g/cc, but this is still one order of magnitude lower density than water ice (~0.92g/cc). So the atmosphere would have to be much higher pressure to increase the density. I do not know if there are chemicals that have a gaseous phase under pressure that is denser than any sold materials. For example the density of the atmosphere on the surface of venus (92x pressure on earth) is about 6.5% of water. Apparently on venus the pressure is high enough at the surface that CO2 is technically not a gas any more but a super critical fluid.

Once habitable world destroyed by cosmic event in short time:
Not sure what you mean by cosmic catastrophe (the thought experiment? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_catastrophe) , but I would say sudden death by space rock is very real, the dinos were wiped out by one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GTOM
essenmein said:
Asteroid storm: I would say its possible in the short term, say after a collision of larger bodies, but the density of mass would diffuse into the vacuum of space, I have no idea what the time frames would be.

Habitable storm planet: I think an advanced civilization realizing their planet is about to turn into a storm planet might be able to build underground to evade, but I don't know if it would work if it always had destructive storms, I guess depends on how bad. But the life on this planet would have had to survive without technology in the early stage of evolution on that planet, I think this is less likely as single cell organisms (ie the start of life here) would be a bit more vulnerable to destruction. Basically a chicken and the egg argument, if you need to build underground to survive, how did you evolve to be able to do that in the first place?

Floating rocks: Buoyancy is simply a ratio of densities (as long as there is some acceleration acting on them), if you have a gas dense enough rocks will float. The highest density gas we have (according to google at room temp and 1atm) is Tungsten hexaflouride, this has a density of 12.4g/l, or 0.0124g/cc, but this is still one order of magnitude lower density than water ice (~0.92g/cc). So the atmosphere would have to be much higher pressure to increase the density. I do not know if there are chemicals that have a gaseous phase under pressure that is denser than any sold materials. For example the density of the atmosphere on the surface of venus (92x pressure on earth) is about 6.5% of water. Apparently on venus the pressure is high enough at the surface that CO2 is technically not a gas any more but a super critical fluid.

Once habitable world destroyed by cosmic event in short time:
Not sure what you mean by cosmic catastrophe (the thought experiment? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_catastrophe) , but I would say sudden death by space rock is very real, the dinos were wiped out by one.
Asteroid hit isn't bad, but i thought about something even worse that can't be stopped by a civilization that can build generation ships.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
15K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
6K