Can You Beat a Machine in IQ Test-Like Games?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EPitter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Machine
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the performance of a machine in IQ test-like games, specifically focusing on a numeric solver that attempts to complete sequences. Participants explore the capabilities and limitations of the machine, sharing their experiences and thoughts on the nature of the sequences presented.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express disappointment in the machine's ability to solve complex sequences, suggesting it relies on exhaustive searches of known sequences rather than true intelligence.
  • Others propose that the machine may be using a neural network approach, attempting to learn from user-generated problems and patterns.
  • One participant shares two challenging sequences they provided to the machine, noting that it failed to solve them, and discusses the complexity of the sequences.
  • Several participants discuss the appropriateness of certain types of sequences, debating whether they are fair or helpful for the machine's learning process.
  • There is a suggestion that populating the machine with Sloane's database could enhance its capabilities, although some argue that the complexity of the database may not be suitable for the project.
  • A participant presents a sequence they found difficult to solve and invites others to provide the solution, which is later shared along with a proposed logic behind it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the machine's intelligence or effectiveness, with multiple competing views on its capabilities and the nature of the sequences it should handle. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to improve the machine's performance.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the machine's reliance on known sequences and the complexity of the problems it is expected to solve. There are also unresolved questions about the machine's learning methodology and the appropriateness of certain sequence types.

EPitter
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In this page you can play against a machine in IQ test-like games. Very funny.

www.theiqchallenge.com
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
WTF ? I tried the Numeric Solver game where I took turns with the machine. I could solve all of its trivially easy sequences nearly instantly, but it couldn't solve any of mine. Of course, mine are tough, but that machine is certainly not very bright !

All jokes aside, the numeric solver simply asks you to complete your sequence correctly and archives the info. I think this "intelligent" machine is just exhaustively searching known sequences for the answer. What a disappointment.
 
Curious3141 said:
All jokes aside, the numeric solver simply asks you to complete your sequence correctly and archives the info. I think this "intelligent" machine is just exhaustively searching known sequences for the answer. What a disappointment.

Sounds like it's a neural network, and they're trying to feed in data by getting people to throw problems at it. Far easier to let 10,000 people enter a few problems each rather than to sit there yourself feeding it information. Essentially, it's like you said insofar as it catalogs sequences it encounters, but the difference is that it tries to look for relevant patterns within the solutions, and apply them elsewhere.

Once they get it to start recognizing primes, I'll be impressed. And if the program gets "smart enough", they can use it on REAL problems. But I'd bet it's a long way off yet.

DaveE
 
davee123 said:
Essentially, it's like you said insofar as it catalogs sequences it encounters, but the difference is that it tries to look for relevant patterns within the solutions, and apply them elsewhere

Well, I wish it joy of effort. The two sequences I gave it were hard, I would consider one of them very hard.

The first one was 2, 6, 33, 280, 3245, ?

The machine didn't get it. I was going for (n^n + n!) I would consider this one to be a "hard" sequence, but probably solvable within a few minutes of thought by a person with an IQ of over 150.

The second one was a sequence I'd consider very hard :

1, 5, 3, 7, 2, 7, 27, 8, ?

This is a nice sequence representing the sum of the distinct digits in the decimal expansions of the reciprocals of the natural numbers before they repeat for the first time (if that). I gave this once to a person with a measured IQ of over 180, and he got it after some difficulty.

Both those sequences are in Sloane's database (the latter is my contribution to it).

Of course, I realize I was aiming very high, but if the computer had gotten those, it would've knocked my socks off.
 
Well, you can do things like:
Number of letters in the German word for the number
4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 4, 4 ,4, 3, 5, 8, 8...

But any sane person would expect to see:
4, 4, 4, 4, 4 -> 4
 
NateTG said:
Well, you can do things like:
Number of letters in the German word for the number
4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 4, 4 ,4, 3, 5, 8, 8...

But any sane person would expect to see:
4, 4, 4, 4, 4 -> 4

That would be too open ended to be a "nice" (or fair) sequence. It is a tough one though ! :biggrin:
 
NateTG said:
Well, you can do things like:
Number of letters in the German word for the number
4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 4, 4 ,4, 3, 5, 8, 8...

But any sane person would expect to see:
4, 4, 4, 4, 4 -> 4

Well, I believe they're trying to expressly forbid that type of problem on the "numeric" version. Effectively, it should be mathematical in nature, and not something bizarre. By the same token I could list 2,3,5,6,8,9,10,12,13,... as numbers where the digits are curved, or 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,3,1,2,... as the number of syllables in the English pronunciation, or 10,5,9,6,6,6,7,8,8,5,... as the number of letters in the last names of US presidents.

Problems like that are interesting, but unhelpful to the program for learning, and will probably only serve to confuse it.

DaveE
 
Why not just start by populating it with sloane's db then?
 
NateTG said:
Why not just start by populating it with sloane's db then?

They might've! Hard to say, really. If they did, it's likely that it didn't help, or else at the very least it would've been able to figure out a sequence of primes.

It did give me one I couldn't solve right away. Anyone?
1, 2, 6, 14, 29, 56, 102

DaveE
 
  • #10
NateTG said:
Why not just start by populating it with sloane's db then?

Sloane's is just too complex to be ported en masse to this project. At least, they haven't done it yet, otherwise it would've gotten the two sequences I posed it.
 
  • #11
NateTG said:
Why not just start by populating it with sloane's db then?

After reading the project page ( www.kitbit.com ), I don't think they're going to do it. It doesn't look like a DB based AI model. I might be wrong, but I think the high expectations they have put on their system are not compatible with making a huge DB.
 
  • #12
Serie solved

It did give me one I couldn't solve right away. Anyone?
1, 2, 6, 14, 29, 56, 102

the solution is:

1, 2, 6, 14, 29, 56, 102, 176, 289, 454
 
  • #13
perry123 said:
the solution is:

1, 2, 6, 14, 29, 56, 102, 176, 289, 454

So, what's the logic behind it?

DaveE
 
  • #14
The best I can figure out is that the sequence (including the extension) can be written as:
[tex]x_i=2*x_{i-1}+p(i)[/tex]
Where [itex]p(i)[/itex] is a quartic polynomial.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K