Can you beat the world champion's speed reading record?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hierophant
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a reading speed test available on a Staples website, which estimates how fast individuals can read. Participants share their results, with some claiming speeds significantly above the average, including one individual who reported 4700 words per minute, attributed to exceptional abilities like photographic memory. Many users express curiosity about their own scores, with results varying widely, from around 200 to over 1500 words per minute. The conversation highlights factors influencing reading speed, such as familiarity with the text, sub-vocalization, and the importance of practice. Some participants mention distractions and comprehension issues, particularly with older or complex texts used in the test, like "War of the Worlds" and "Alice in Wonderland." There are also humorous exchanges about the absurdity of some scores and the challenges of reading comprehension versus speed. Overall, the thread emphasizes the variability in reading speeds and the subjective experience of reading.
  • #31
Enigman said:
Copyright issues perhaps? and they probably wanted a famous text which was easily recognizable...its for marketing of e-readers:
It surely wasn't recognizable.
It was highly confusing and I had to re-read it several times, and gave up getting it.

In other words, it wasn't interesting or enjoyable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #33
"I took a speed-reading course and read War and Peace in twenty minutes. It involves Russia." (Woody Allen)
 
  • #34
Crop your puns Caveat.
 
  • #35
lmao that was a wild guess, I'm an average reader
 
  • #36
Caveat said:
lmao that was a wild guess, I'm an average reader
:smile:
I meant crop the picture not the post...picture was exceeding the post frame.
 
  • #37
lol yeah I know but it would have been deleted anyways because I was just being silly.. I couldn't read 3000 wpm if my life depended on it
 
  • #38
Mandelbroth said:
Amoebae don't have finals to worry about. :-p

I feel like this would be the biggest upside. :D
 
  • #39
Around 840wpm for me, 3/3 correct (843 on the first test, 837 on the second).
 
  • #40
First try, I got 245...the writing was different from what I'm used to so I read a little slower. The second try, I got 331.
 
  • #41
Evo said:
. . .I guess considering I have mild OCD and need to make sense of things. It made no sense. Eh, I read for pleasure, not for speed.

I have severe OCD and sometimes compulsively reread sentences ten or fifteen times. It helps me memorize the material, though. :D
 
  • #42
I got 4WPM. Oh oops - forgot to read the directions, takes too long... this took 6 minutes to write and then check...
 
  • #43
You read 10,540 words per minute.
That makes you 4,116% faster than the national average.

That's because I clicked finish right away, I immediately recognized the passage, all three questions were right.

When I do it for reals I get 230 wpm, I guess I appreciate reading comprehension more than the swiftness of reading.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
16K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K