Can you check this proof please: sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter workerant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sets
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
workerant
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A,B,C,D are sets.

Prove that if C is contained in A and D is contained in B, then C∩ D is contained in A∩ B.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Let x be any element.

Then There exists (x that belongs to C∩D) and (x does not belong to A∩ B)

So x belongs to C and x belongs to D

If x belongs to C, since C is contained in A, then x belongs to A.
If x belongs to D, since D is contained in B, then x belongs to B.
So x belongs to A intersect B, a contradiction.

Then the original statement is true.

Is it okay?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
workerant said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Let x be any element.

Then There exists (x that belongs to C∩D) and (x does not belong to A∩ B)

That needn't be the case at all. Let [itex]A=B=C=D=\mathbb{R}[/itex].
 
Well, then can I say to assume that because I am trying to do a proof by contradiction.

I'm confused by what you are saying...I should say A=B=C=D=R and then what? I'm not sure I follow...is the rest okay?
 
Don't do proof by contradiction, it just muddles things. Everything else was fine.

So x belongs to C and x belongs to D

If x belongs to C, since C is contained in A, then x belongs to A.
If x belongs to D, since D is contained in B, then x belongs to B.
So x belongs to A intersect B,

Hence all x in C intersect D are in A intersect B, and C intersect D is a subset of A intersect B. It's much cleaner that way
 
workerant said:
Well, then can I say to assume that because I am trying to do a proof by contradiction.

I'm confused by what you are saying...I should say A=B=C=D=R and then what?

I was giving you a counterexample to demonstrate that your opening statement is false. If you let all 4 sets equal the real numbers then it is not the case that that there exists an [itex]x\in C\cap D[/itex] with [itex]x\notin A\cap B[/itex].
 
workerant said:
If x belongs to C, since C is contained in A, then x belongs to A.
If x belongs to D, since D is contained in B, then x belongs to B.
So x belongs to A intersect B, a contradiction.

I agree with Office Shredder that you should forget about proof by contradiction here, but I don't agree that this all by itself is fine. You should include a line that says that [itex]x\in C\cap D[/itex]. After all, you're supposed to show that [itex](C \cap D) \subset (A \cap B)[/itex]. Those two sets should be connected by your argument.
 
thanks guys...I actually I did include such a line in my formal write-up so thanks