Can You Explain Beta Minus Decay and its Relation to Neutrinos?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasnain721
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beta Decay
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around beta minus decay, specifically its mechanisms and the role of neutrinos in the process. The original poster seeks clarification on a question related to energy distribution in beta decay.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of beta decay, including the products involved (electron and antineutrino) and the implications for energy distribution. Questions are raised about the expected energy range of the electron if only one product were present.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the relationship between the products of beta decay and the energy distribution observed. Some participants affirm each other's understanding, but no consensus on the broader implications has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of missing information regarding the specifics of the energy distribution graph referenced by the original poster, which may affect the clarity of the discussion.

hasnain721
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] beta minus decay?

Hi,
Here is a question from beta minus decay which i could not understand :


http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/2512/59060072re9.jpg


I could do the first bit but not the second. I believe that it has something to do with neutrinos and missing energy but i am not 100% sure about it.


Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hasnain,

Beta decay involves the transition of a parent nucleus into a daughter nucleus with two sideproducts; an electron and an antineutrino.

Since the nucleus is so massive, it carries little kinetic energy away from the reaction (it recoils very little), the vast majority of the energy goes into the two sideproducts.

Now let me ask you a question:

If there was only the electron as a sideproduct, would there be a continuous range of energies as we see here?
 
astrorob said:
hasnain,

Beta decay involves the transition of a parent nucleus into a daughter nucleus with two sideproducts; an electron and an antineutrino.

Since the nucleus is so massive, it carries little kinetic energy away from the reaction (it recoils very little), the vast majority of the energy goes into the two sideproducts.

Now let me ask you a question:

If there was only the electron as a sideproduct, would there be a continuous range of energies as we see here?

hi,
Thanks a lot for replyin astrorob.


As far as the question goes, i believe that if only an electron was a side product them the graph would have been a straight line parallel to the y axis. Is that right?
 
hasnain,

You are correct. There would be only a small range of energies the electron could carry away and this would manifest itself (essentially) as a straight line at x=0.78.
 
astrorob said:
hasnain,

You are correct. There would be only a small range of energies the electron could carry away and this would manifest itself (essentially) as a straight line at x=0.78.



Thanks a lot astrorob.

CHeers!
 
You're welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K