MHB Can you simplify a monstrous remainder problem using modular arithmetic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Remainder
Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Find ${5^{2009}}^{1492}\mod{503}.$

How do you calculate a beast like this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you know about Euler's theorem, or Fermat's little theorem? Powers of 5 are periodic modulo 503, so your expression can be simplified if you can find what that big exponent is modulo that period. Euler's theorem tells us that the period is divisible by divides 503 - 1 = 502 (since 503 is prime). Does that make sense?

If that doesn't help, what if you replaced 503 by, say, 7, does that make it simpler to reason about?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top