MHB Can You Solve for m and n in x^2+mx+n=0 with Only One Possible Value for x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In the equation x^2 + mx + n = 0, with -3 as the only root, the values of m and n can be determined through various methods. Using the vertex form and the discriminant, it is established that m must equal 6 and n must equal 9. The discriminant must be zero for a quadratic with a single root, leading to the equations m^2 - 4n = 0 and 9 - 3m + n = 0. Both approaches confirm that the solution is consistent, resulting in the pair (m, n) = (6, 9). This problem illustrates the relationship between the coefficients of a quadratic and its roots effectively.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
My friend and I love to challenge each other from time to time when we come across a new question in a textbook or online. Here is the question he found. In the equation x^2+mx+n=0, m and n are integers. The only possible value for x is -3. What is the value of m and n?

I am thinking discriminant: b^2 - 4ac, where a = 1, b = m and c = n.

Correct approach?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
My friend and I love to challenge each other from time to time when we come across a new question in a textbook or online. Here is the question he found. In the equation x^2+mx+n=0, m and n are integers. The only possible value for x is -3. What is the value of m and n?

I am thinking discriminant: b^2 - 4ac, where a = 1, b = m and c = n.

Correct approach?

What I would do is from the given information, we know:

$$x^2+mx+n=(x+3)^2$$

Expand the RHS, and then equate coefficients to determine $m$ and $n$.

Now, you could use the discriminant...what must its value be? Can you determine another equation with $m$ and $n$ using the given root?
 
How about this solution?

Let x = -3

x +3 = 0

(x+3)^2 = x^2 + 6x + 9

m = 6; n = 9

Correct?
 
RTCNTC said:
How about this solution?

Let x = -3

x +3 = 0

(x+3)^2 = x^2 + 6x + 9

m = 6; n = 9

Correct?

Yep. :D

Let's look at using the discriminant as you initially posted.

If a quadratic has only one root, then its discriminant must be zero, and so we obtain:

$$m^2-4n=0$$

Using the given root $x=-3$, we also have:

$$9-3m+n=0$$

If we multiply this by 4, we get:

$$36-12m+4n=0$$

The first equation (regarding the discriminant) implies $4n=m^2$, and we have:

$$m^2-12m+36=(m-6)^2=0\implies m=6\implies n=9$$

Now, we could also reason that a quadratic having only one root, will have its axis of symmetry at that root. Recall the axis of symmetry for the general quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ is given by:

$$x=-\frac{b}{2a}$$

So we would have:

$$-\frac{m}{2}=-3\implies m=6$$

And then using either the discriminant, or the value of the quadratic at the root, we can easily find $n=9$.

We could also write the quadratic in vertex form:

$$x^2+mx+n=\left(x^2+mx+\frac{m^2}{4}\right)+n-\frac{m^2}{4}=\left(x+\frac{m}{2}\right)^2+\frac{4n-m^2}{4}$$

We know the vertex must be at $(-3,0)$, and so this gives us:

$$\frac{m}{2}=3$$

$$\frac{4n-m^2}{4}=0$$

And from this we easily find:

$$(m,n)=(6,9)$$
 
Interesting question for sure.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K