MHB Can You Solve for m and n in x^2+mx+n=0 with Only One Possible Value for x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the equation x^2 + mx + n = 0, with -3 as the only root, the values of m and n can be determined through various methods. Using the vertex form and the discriminant, it is established that m must equal 6 and n must equal 9. The discriminant must be zero for a quadratic with a single root, leading to the equations m^2 - 4n = 0 and 9 - 3m + n = 0. Both approaches confirm that the solution is consistent, resulting in the pair (m, n) = (6, 9). This problem illustrates the relationship between the coefficients of a quadratic and its roots effectively.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
My friend and I love to challenge each other from time to time when we come across a new question in a textbook or online. Here is the question he found. In the equation x^2+mx+n=0, m and n are integers. The only possible value for x is -3. What is the value of m and n?

I am thinking discriminant: b^2 - 4ac, where a = 1, b = m and c = n.

Correct approach?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
My friend and I love to challenge each other from time to time when we come across a new question in a textbook or online. Here is the question he found. In the equation x^2+mx+n=0, m and n are integers. The only possible value for x is -3. What is the value of m and n?

I am thinking discriminant: b^2 - 4ac, where a = 1, b = m and c = n.

Correct approach?

What I would do is from the given information, we know:

$$x^2+mx+n=(x+3)^2$$

Expand the RHS, and then equate coefficients to determine $m$ and $n$.

Now, you could use the discriminant...what must its value be? Can you determine another equation with $m$ and $n$ using the given root?
 
How about this solution?

Let x = -3

x +3 = 0

(x+3)^2 = x^2 + 6x + 9

m = 6; n = 9

Correct?
 
RTCNTC said:
How about this solution?

Let x = -3

x +3 = 0

(x+3)^2 = x^2 + 6x + 9

m = 6; n = 9

Correct?

Yep. :D

Let's look at using the discriminant as you initially posted.

If a quadratic has only one root, then its discriminant must be zero, and so we obtain:

$$m^2-4n=0$$

Using the given root $x=-3$, we also have:

$$9-3m+n=0$$

If we multiply this by 4, we get:

$$36-12m+4n=0$$

The first equation (regarding the discriminant) implies $4n=m^2$, and we have:

$$m^2-12m+36=(m-6)^2=0\implies m=6\implies n=9$$

Now, we could also reason that a quadratic having only one root, will have its axis of symmetry at that root. Recall the axis of symmetry for the general quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ is given by:

$$x=-\frac{b}{2a}$$

So we would have:

$$-\frac{m}{2}=-3\implies m=6$$

And then using either the discriminant, or the value of the quadratic at the root, we can easily find $n=9$.

We could also write the quadratic in vertex form:

$$x^2+mx+n=\left(x^2+mx+\frac{m^2}{4}\right)+n-\frac{m^2}{4}=\left(x+\frac{m}{2}\right)^2+\frac{4n-m^2}{4}$$

We know the vertex must be at $(-3,0)$, and so this gives us:

$$\frac{m}{2}=3$$

$$\frac{4n-m^2}{4}=0$$

And from this we easily find:

$$(m,n)=(6,9)$$
 
Interesting question for sure.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top