Can You Solve This Complex Fourier Transform Problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Fourier transform of the function f(x) = 1/(x² + a²)², where a > 0, and demonstrating that the inverse Fourier transform returns the original function. Participants are exploring the implications of their calculations and the use of the Heaviside step function in their results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration paths for the Fourier transform based on the sign of k and the resulting residues. There are inquiries about the implementation of the Heaviside step function in the context of their solutions and how to combine results for different k values. One participant raises a question about the upper bound of an integral when attempting to find the inverse transform.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the use of the step function and its role in the integration process. There is an ongoing exploration of how to handle the inverse Fourier transform and the implications of the bounds on the integrals involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of complex integrals and the properties of the step function, which introduces additional considerations in their calculations. The discussion reflects a mix of understanding and uncertainty regarding the integration techniques and the behavior of functions at infinity.

dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the Fourier transform of
[tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{(x^2+a^2)^2},\ a>0[/tex], and show by direct calculation that with inverse Fourier transform you'll get the original function [tex]f(x)[/tex]!


Homework Equations


Fourier transform and it's inverse:
[tex]F(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)e^{i k x}dx[/tex]
[tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty F(k)e^{-ikx}dk[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I have put my function into the transform and I got:
[tex]F(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{ikx}}{(x^2+a^2)^2}dx[/tex]

I have transformed it to complex integral and since k is arbitrary I have two possible paths of integration, for k>0 in the upper plane and for k<0 in the lower plane. My resudues are:

[tex]Res(f,ia)=-i\frac{e^{-ka}}{4a^3}(1+ka)[/tex] and

[tex]Res(f,-ia)=i\frac{e^ka}{4a^3}(1-ka)[/tex].

So for k>0 my integral (without the [tex](2\pi)^{-1/2}[/tex]) is:
[tex]I=\pi \frac{e^{-ka}}{2a^3}(1+ka)[/tex]
And for k<0:
[tex]I=\pi\frac{e^{ka}}{2a^3}(1-ka)[/tex]

Now the problem is: which one do I use? Mathematica gives me this:
[tex]\frac{1}{2a^3}\cdot\ \sqrt{\frac{2}{{\pi}}}e^{-ak}\left((ak+1)\theta(k)-e^{2ak}(ak-1)\theta(-k)\right)[/tex]
Where [tex]\theta(x)[/tex] is Heaviside Step function.

I have noticed that the solutions of those integral are similar but how do I implement the step function? Plus how would I integrate it? I know that the derivative of step function is Delta function, but I don't know what the integral of it is?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral of a step function is much simpler to deal with than the derivative. It's simply the area under the step!
 
Just break the integral up into two pieces, from [itex]-\infty[/itex] to 0 and from 0 to [itex]\infty[/itex]. One step function will equal 0, and the other will equal 1 in each integral.
 
vela said:
Just break the integral up into two pieces, from [itex]-\infty[/itex] to 0 and from 0 to [itex]\infty[/itex]. One step function will equal 0, and the other will equal 1 in each integral.

Oh, ok that's fine. But still how did I get the step in the first place? When I was computing the transform I got 2 solutions for [tex]k\lessgtr 0[/tex], do I need to combine them to get the step or? And If I do how to do that?
 
Yes, the step function just let's you indicate for which part of the domain the function it multiplies should apply. The [itex]\theta(k)[/itex] says the [itex](ak+1)[/tex] part only contributes for [itex]k>0[/itex] because [itex]\theta(k)[/itex] is zero for [itex]k<0[/itex] and one for [itex]k>0[/itex]. Similarly, the [itex]\theta(-k)[/itex] says the [itex]e^{2ak}(ak-1)[/itex] term contributes only for [itex]k<0[/itex]. Using the step function allows you to combine the two solutions you got for [itex]k>0[/itex] and [itex]k<0[/itex] into one expression.[/itex]
 
Thanks for clarification!
 
Hi I have a question about this problem... again :(

I know why I get these results with step function, that's all fine, but now I need to find the inverse (the original function).

So I have:
[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty F(k)e^{-i kx}dk[/tex]. I put my previous solution up there, step function 'kills' the bounds in the integral (for [tex]\theta(k)[/tex] my integral becomes: [tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty \theta(k)dk=\int_0^\infty[/tex], right?) So I end up with 2 integrals which could be solved easily. But I have problem with that. If I try to solve this integral:
[tex]\int_0^\infty e^{-ik(x-ia)}(1+ka)dk[/tex]
I have problem with that upper bound. I have [tex]e^{i\cdot\infty}[/tex], and what should I make of that? If I try to solve this with residues, I have a difficulty, because I don't have [tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty[/tex] or even function so that I could make [tex]\int_0^\infty=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^\infty[/tex]. So how to solve it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K