MHB Can You Solve This Trigonometric Equation for $x$?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the trigonometric equation $2\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin 16^\circ \sin 76^\circ=\sin 2028^\circ \sin 210^\circ$ for $0 < x < 180^\circ$. Participants engage in deriving solutions and simplifying the equation, with some noting the importance of understanding the sine function's periodicity. A solution was identified that had initially been overlooked, highlighting the collaborative nature of problem-solving in the forum. The conversation emphasizes the significance of careful analysis in trigonometric equations. Overall, the thread showcases effective mathematical discourse and solution-finding.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Solve for $x$ such that $2\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin 16^\circ \sin 76^\circ=\sin 2028^\circ \sin 210^\circ$ for $0\lt x \lt 180^\circ$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Solve for $x$ such that $2\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin 16^\circ \sin 76^\circ=\sin 2028^\circ \sin 210^\circ$ for $0\lt x \lt 180^\circ$.

$$\sin2028^\circ\sin210^\circ=-\dfrac{\sin228^\circ}{2}=\dfrac{\sin48^\circ}{2}$$

$$\sin48^\circ=4\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin16^\circ\sin76^\circ$$

$$3\sin16^\circ-4\sin^316^\circ=4\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin16^\circ\sin76^\circ$$

$$1+2\cos32^\circ=4\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin76^\circ$$

$$1+2\cos32^\circ=2(\cos(x-46^\circ)-\cos(x+106^\circ))$$

$$\text{By inspection, }x=14^\circ$$
 
anemone said:
Solve for $x$ such that $2\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin 16^\circ \sin 76^\circ=\sin 2028^\circ \sin 210^\circ$ for $0\lt x \lt 180^\circ$.

$2\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin 16^\circ \sin 76^\circ=\sin 2028^\circ \sin 210^\circ$
= $\sin (360^\circ * 5 + 180^\circ + 48^\circ) \sin (180^\circ +30^\circ)$
= $(-\sin\, 48^\circ) (-\sin \,30^\circ)$
= $\dfrac{\sin\,48^\circ}{2}$
= $\dfrac{\sin\, 3*16^\circ}{2}$
= $\dfrac{3\sin\,16^\circ-4\sin ^3 16^\circ}{2}$
hence
$2\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin 16^\circ \sin 76^\circ = \sin\,16^\circ \dfrac{3-4\sin ^2 16^\circ}{2}$
or
$4\sin(x+30^\circ)\sin 76^\circ = 3-4\sin ^2 16^\circ$
= $ 1 + 2(1-2\sin^2 16^\circ)$
= $ 1+ 2 \cos\,32^\circ$
= $(2(\cos\,60^\circ +2 \cos\,32^\circ)$
= $ 2 (2 \cos\,46^\circ \cos\,14^\circ)$
= $ 4 \cos\,46^\circ \sin \,76^\circ$
hence
$\sin(x+30^\circ)=\cos\,46^\circ=\sin\,44^\circ$
or $x=14^\circ$

edit there is a solution I missed based on comment below
in the 2nd quadrant
$\sin(x+30^\circ)=\sin\,136^\circ$
so $x= 106^\circ$
 
Last edited:
Thanks both for participating and the solution...but...

Are you certain you haven't missed any solution? (Mmm)
 
anemone said:
Thanks both for participating and the solution...but...

Are you certain you haven't missed any solution? (Mmm)
I missed the solution $x + 30^\circ = 136^\circ$ or $x = 106^\circ$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top