I Can you tell the difference between two neutrons in an alpha particle?

wasong
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Can you tell the difference between two neutrons in an alpha particle?
Can you tell the difference between two neutrons in an alpha particle? In one alpha particle, we know that the sum of the spins of two neutrons is zero. Can a neutron with upspin and a neutron with downspin be distinguished from each other? Or can't you tell because it's superimposed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neutrons are indistinguishable fermions. All you can say is that when measuring the spins of the two neutrons you find with some probability each of the 4 possible outcomes, given by the prepared state, in this case a bound state of 2 protons and 2 neutrons within a 4He nucleus.

Where did you get the information about the sum of the spins of the two neutrons being zero?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and atyy
vanhees71 said:
Where did you get the information about the sum of the spins of the two neutrons being zero?
My knowledge of nuclear physics is almost zero, but I guess that if the two neutrons are understood to be in the ground state of a potential well, then Pauli's principle demands that they are in a singlet state.
 
But it's a bound state of four particles not two particles in a potential well.
 
vanhees71 said:
But it's a bound state of four particles not two particles in a potential well.
That's how nuclei are modeled, particles within a potential well, like Wood-Saxon. Besides, the total wavefunction is antisymmetric for the proton variable and antisymmetric for the neutron variables, but there are no antisymmetry demands between one neutron and one proton.

http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/ab1u06/teaching/phys3002/course/05_shell.pdf

Anyways, a better answer requires someone that actually knows nuclear physics. I'm curious to know if my guess is correct or not.
 
andresB said:
I'm curious to know if my guess is correct or not.
Not really. Alphas are not ordinary nuclei, since every nucleon is in the 1S state. (Indeed, by some measures, an alpha is smaller than a proton).

The model of one particle in the potential well created by the other three is not very good for alphas. Two and two is even worse.

And guessing tends to confuse the OP more than clarifying. It's better to ask on another thread.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes protonsarecool, vanhees71 and PeroK
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top