Canonical ensemble <(Delta E)^3> expression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the canonical ensemble's <(Delta E)^3> using the grand-canonical partition function for an ideal gas. The participants explore the relationship between the partition function and energy expectations, specifically evaluating U and <Delta E^2> through differentiation. There is a suggestion to use an explicit example system to clarify the derivation process. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying principles of statistical mechanics in this context. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in calculating energy fluctuations within canonical ensembles.
GrandsonOfMagnusCarl
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Given: <(Delta E)^2> = k_B T^2 C_V

Show: <(Delta E)^3> = k_B^2 [T^4 (d C_V / d T)_V + 2 T^3 C_V]
Relevant Equations
stat mech, thermo
I try involving differentiating ^2 but I get an expression of different proportionality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess, that's for an ideal gas? If so then just get the grand-canonical partition function
$$Z(\beta,\alpha,V)=V \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \exp(-\beta p^2/(2m)+\alpha)$$
and evaluate ##U=\langle E \rangle=-\partial_{\beta} Z/Z##, ##\langle \Delta E^2 \rangle=\partial_{\beta}^2 Z/Z- \langle E \rangle^2##,...
 
vanhees71 said:
I guess, that's for an ideal gas? If so then just get the grand-canonical partition function
$$Z(\beta,\alpha,V)=V \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \exp(-\beta p^2/(2m)+\alpha)$$
and evaluate ##U=\langle E \rangle=-\partial_{\beta} Z/Z##, ##\langle \Delta E^2 \rangle=\partial_{\beta}^2 Z/Z- \langle E \rangle^2##,...
For any canonical ensemble.
Ah, yours would be an approach. I never thought of using an explicit example system to find that resulting expression.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...
Thread 'Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem'
Hi, I'm stuck at this question, please help. Attempt to the Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem (a) Electric Field and Potential at O due to Induced Charges $$V_O = 0$$ This potential is the sum of the potentials due to the real charges (##+q, -q##) and the induced charges on the sphere. $$V_O = V_{\text{real}} + V_{\text{induced}} = 0$$ - Electric Field at O, ##\vec{E}_O##: Since point O is inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, the electric field there must be zero...
Back
Top