Why is the entropy calculated differently in the microcanonical ensemble?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of entropy in the context of the microcanonical ensemble in statistical mechanics. Participants are exploring the definitions and relationships between phase volume and entropy, particularly focusing on the expressions for entropy as S(E,N,V) = ln Γ(E,N,V) and S(E,N,V) = k_B ln(ω(E,N,V)).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the rationale behind the entropy definitions and their equivalence in the microcanonical ensemble. There are discussions about the implications of large N and the concentration of volume in high-dimensional spaces. Some participants express confusion regarding the relationship between ω(E) and Γ(E + δE).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify their understanding of the definitions and their implications. Some guidance has been offered regarding the approximation of ω(E) and Γ(E) for large N, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of statistical mechanics, particularly the nuances of entropy calculations in the microcanonical ensemble. There is an emphasis on the behavior of systems with a large number of dimensions and the assumptions that accompany these discussions.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
Ideal gas which consist of ##N## identical particles which moving free inside volume ##V## where all collisions between particles and walls of container are absolute elastic. Calculate phase volume ##\Gamma##, entropy ##S##, temperature ##T## and pressure of gas.
Relevant Equations
Hamiltonian
[tex]H=\sum^{3N}_{i=1}\frac{p_i^2}{2m}[/tex]
[tex]\Gamma(E,N,V)=\int_{H(p,q) \leq E}\frac{dpdq}{h^{3N}N!}[/tex]
I have a problem to understand why this problem is microcanonical ensemble problem? And why entropy is calculated as
S(E,N,V)=\ln \Gamma(E,N,V)
When in microcanonical ensemble we spoke about energies between ##E## and ##E+\Delta E##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\Gamma(E,N,V)## is defined as the phase volume which contains all points in ##\Gamma## space with energy lower than or equal to ##E##. Regarding a microcanonical ensemble in the energy range ##[E,E + \delta E]##, the corresponding volume is given by ##\omega(E,N,V)=\Gamma(E+\delta E,N,V)-\Gamma(E,N,V)##.
For the entropy, one has then ##S(E,N,V)=k_Bln(\omega(E,N,V))##.

For very large ##N##, one finds that the following definitions for the entropy are identical up to terms of order ##lnN## and constants:
##S_{\omega}=k_Bln(\omega(E))## and ##S_{\Gamma}=k_Bln(\Gamma(E))##

Have a look, for example, at chapter 2.2 of Statistical Physics by Manfred Sigrist: https://www.e-booksdirectory.com/details.php?ebook=6060
 
Last edited:
Yes undestand what you want to say. But is not than the case that entropy
S=k_Bln(\omega(E))=k_Bln(\Gamma(E+\delta E))
Because in large number of dimension almost all volume of sphere is concentrated around the surface.
 
Last edited:
$$\omega(E,N,V)=\Gamma(E+\delta E,N,V)-\Gamma(E,N,V) =\frac {\partial \Gamma(E,N,V)} {\partial E} \delta E$$
 
Yes I understand what is ##\omega##. My question is why
S=k_Bln(\omega(E))=k_Bln(\Gamma(E+\delta E))?
 
LagrangeEuler said:
Because in large number of dimension almost all volume of sphere is concentrated around the surface.
You already have the answer.

If I understand the notation correctly, then for large ##N##: ##\omega(E) \approx \Gamma(E)##
 
I am confused there. Because if I have that n large number of dimension almost all volume of sphere is concentrated around the surface. That means to my mind that if energy changes from ##E-\Delta E## to ##E## that I can use approximation that we are talking about.
 
Sorry, I'm not understanding your problem.
 
LagrangeEuler said:
Yes I understand what is ##\omega##. My question is why
S=k_Bln(\omega(E))=k_Bln(\Gamma(E+\delta E))?
You overcomplicate the issue:
S=k_Bln(\omega(E))\approx k_Bln(\Gamma(E))
holds for a microcanonical ensemble with energies between ##E## and ##E+\delta E## in case of very large ##N##. Have a look at equations (2.43) and (2.44) in chapter 2.2 of Statistical Physics by Manfred Sigrist.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K