Canonical transformations, generating function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on canonical transformations derived from the generating function F=\sum _i f_i (q_j,t)P_i. Participants explore the conditions under which generalized coordinates transform canonically, specifically addressing the equations p_i=\frac{\partial F }{\partial q_i}, P_i=-\frac{\partial F }{\partial Q_i}, and H'=H+\frac{\partial F }{\partial t}. The confusion surrounding the notation and the implications of the canonical transformation \Phi (q,P)=\alpha qP is highlighted, emphasizing the need for clarity in understanding the relationship between momentum and position in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with generating functions in classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of canonical transformations
  • Proficiency in partial derivatives and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of canonical transformations in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Learn about generating functions and their role in classical mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the equations of motion in Hamiltonian systems
  • Investigate the relationship between momentum and position in canonical transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics and Hamiltonian systems, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of canonical transformations.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


Given the generating function F=\sum _i f_i (q_j,t)P_i,
1)Find the corresponding canonical transformations.
2)Show that the transformations of generalized coordinates are canonical transformations.
3)What meaning does the canonical transformation originated by the generating function \Phi (q,P)=\alpha qP has?

Homework Equations


p_i=\frac{\partial F }{\partial q_i}, P_i=-\frac{\partial F }{\partial Q_i}, H'=H+\frac{\partial F }{\partial t}.

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to start. The notation confuses me, particularly the j. Should the sum be a sum over i and j?

Edit:1)Q_i=\frac{\partial F }{\partial P_i}=f_i(q_j,t). A canonical transformation is such that \dot Q_i=\frac{\partial H'}{\partial P_i} and \dot P_i =-\frac{\partial H'}{\partial Q_i}.
Therefore I guess I must verify that \frac{\partial ^2 F}{\partial t \partial P_i}=\dot Q_i and that... oh well I'm totally confused.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
2)This is not really clear to me. I mean, I know that canonical transformations preserve the form of the Hamiltonian equations of motion, but how does this relate to the generating function?3)I'm guessing this means that the momentum and position are related by an exponential function, but I'm not sure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K