Capacitance of coplaner (adjacent) plates

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tommyers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Plates
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The capacitance between two coplanar plates can be approximated using the equation C(pf/cm) = 0.12t/w + 0.09(1+k)log_10(1 + 2w/s + w^2/s^2), where t is the thickness, w is the width, s is the separation, and k is the dielectric constant. This approximation is particularly relevant for adjacent PCB pads or traces. The Boundary Element Method is applicable for modeling coplanar geometries, and Maxwell 2D software provides effective approximations and electric field intensity plots for design purposes. The closed-form solution for infinitely long coplanar strips can be found in Collin's "Field Theory of Guided Waves" (2nd ed).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitance equations, specifically for coplanar geometries.
  • Familiarity with Boundary Element Method for modeling electrical systems.
  • Knowledge of dielectric materials and their constants, such as k for kapton.
  • Experience with simulation software like Maxwell 2D or Sonnet for electromagnetic analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the closed-form solution for parallel strip transmission lines in Collin's "Field Theory of Guided Waves" (ch. 4).
  • Explore the capabilities of Maxwell 2D software for simulating coplanar geometries.
  • Investigate the effects of frequency on equivalent capacitance in real-world applications.
  • Learn about numerical modeling techniques for finite coplanar plates.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, PCB designers, and researchers focused on capacitive effects in coplanar geometries and adjacent traces.

tommyers
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Does anyone know an equation/approximation/model or other to estimate the capacitance between two coplanar (adjacent) plates?

I know that for parallel plates: C = E0*Er*(A/d). I also know that the capacitance decrease as the plates move from a parallel to a coplanar geometry as the electric field becomes non-uniform.

I have been modelling parallel plates using a Boundary Element Method - I was wondering whether such a method would hold for a coplaner geometry?

Any help or thoughts would be much appreciated!

Regards

Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a closed-form solution for the two-dimensional stripline problem, that is, for infinitely long coplanar strips. It is solved by conformal mapping to a parallel plate (well, parallel strip) geometry where the answer is known and simple. Collin works it out in Field Theory of Guided Waves (2nd ed), and I think Smythe may as well (Static and Dynamic Electricity).

I don't know of any analytic solution for finite coplanar plates, and I'll let more knowledgeable folks comment on numerical modeling.
 
Looking around on <http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/phenix/WWW/muon/phnotes/PN125/node1.html> I came across the following:
"For the CSRC chambers the dominant contribution to the capacitance seen by the preamplifiers is the strip-to-strip capacitance. The capacitance between adjacent strips having a thickness, t, width, w, and separation, s, laying on a dielectric with constant, k, is approximately given by,

C(pf/cm) = 0.12t/w + O.O9(1+k)1og_10(l + 2w/s + w^2/s^2).

The second term dominates. Using k=3.5 (kapton), w=10 mm, s = 0.5 mm, t = 2 microns, the capacitance is 1.1 pf/cm. For the prototype test chamber the capacitance was measured to be 1.33 pf/cm in close agreement to the calculated value. We expect the maximum capacitance will be less than 500 pf for all stations so a basic requirement of the front-end electronics is that it must perform to specifications with an input capacitance of 500 pf or less."

I have not tried it out yet or done more than a few minutes search for a more solid reference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please note, in the last post there is a "1" at the start of "log" and an "l" instead of a "1" after the log. The perils of cut and paste.
 
Hi ATGM,

Thank you for this useful link. I am submitting my thesis on Thursday, but I am continuing to work in this area.

I found that Maxwell 2D software provided a very good approximation for coplanar geometries, plus it also produced electric field intensity plots; which helped in the design of my application.

Are coplanar electrodes a passing interest to you or have you an area of research or application in mind?

Regards,
Tom
 
Hi Tom,

I am interested in it from the perspective of adjacent PCB pads or traces, specifically in debugging a breadboarded filter that keeps almost working without quite doing it. With time and dedication I might have re-installed the free version of Sonnet to see if the simple equation in the link is useable. Playing for a few minutes in a borrowed field simulator it looks as if the equation is in the ball park for a configuration with no ground plane. For finite pads, at least, it seems as if the real world is not as constant in equivalent capacitance over frequency as the equation states.

Hope the thesis is well accepted.

Andrew
 
marcusl said:
There is a closed-form solution for the two-dimensional stripline problem, that is, for infinitely long coplanar strips. It is solved by conformal mapping to a parallel plate (well, parallel strip) geometry where the answer is known and simple. Collin works it out in Field Theory of Guided Waves (2nd ed), and I think Smythe may as well (Static and Dynamic Electricity).

I don't know of any analytic solution for finite coplanar plates, and I'll let more knowledgeable folks comment on numerical modeling.

Hey Marcus,

Regarding a coplanar, parallel strip capacitor and referenced Field Theory of Guided Waves by Collin. Could you point me to the page where he derives this? I can't seem to find it. THANKS!
 
He doesn't solve a coplanar capacitor, he solves for the capacitance (and characteristic impedance) of an infinitely long parallel strip transmission line, also known as coplanar waveguide. See Collin ch. 4.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K