Capacitive sensors: mutual capacitance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MyNameIsNeo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Sensors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on computing the capacitance of mutual capacitance sensors, specifically the interaction between intersecting conductors. The user seeks to model the capacitance accurately, considering both the parallel plate capacitor model and additional contributions from surrounding areas. Key points include the distinction between TX-electrodes and RX-electrodes, and the impact of shielding on capacitance. The discussion suggests using simulation software to solve the Poisson equation for precise capacitance calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mutual capacitance sensors and their components
  • Familiarity with parallel plate capacitor models
  • Basic knowledge of the Poisson equation in electrostatics
  • Experience with simulation software for electrical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore software packages for simulating electric fields and capacitance, such as COMSOL Multiphysics
  • Study advanced models for capacitance calculation, including finite element analysis (FEA)
  • Research the effects of dielectric materials on capacitance in sensor applications
  • Learn about shielding techniques and their influence on electric field distribution
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, sensor developers, and researchers interested in the design and optimization of capacitive sensing technologies.

MyNameIsNeo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

I'm playing around with capacitive sensors (mutual capacitance sensors) and interested in computing/approximating the capacitance between the sensor lines. Mutual capacitance sensors usually consist of two lines/conductors that intersect. Obviously, one can model this is a parallel plate capacitor. However, I would be interested in doing this more accurately.

I attached a sketch to illustrate the problem. One can see the two conductors that intersect (for now, the angle of the intersection shall be 90 degrees). In between, let's assume there is air or some other dielectric material. The red area shows the parallel plate of the "parallel plate capacitor". From my understanding, the orange and yellow area should also contribute to the capacitance and this is exactly the part I cannot understand/model. For the model, let's simply assume that the two conductors have infinite length (bold arrow on the top conductor shall indicate that it does not end)

Please note, that for mutual capacitance sensors, there is always one transmitting line, and one or more receiving lines. Hence, they are call TX-electrode, whereas the other ones are named RX-electrode.

I did study computer science and had some courses in EE, too. But I guess this is a little too advanced which is why I'm asking here for your support. In particular, I would like to know:

a) How to compute the complete capacitance
b) Which models/possible solutions exist on how to compute it (is there a significant difference?))
c) How things change when, e.g., a shielding is on top and/or bottom (probably "blocks" the field lines somehow)

Ideally, your explanation is easy to follow for a non-EE/physics student ;-)

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/conductor_intersection-png.76696/?temp_hash=33ae8af28afb2c8cbec51caad716c2e6
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can simulate it to get an approximation - for a given potential difference, iteratively solve the Poisson equation, then determine the electric field strength at the surface of the conductors, calculate the charge and divide it by the given potential difference. Or find a software package that does those steps for you for every geometry you want to study.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K