What Is the Capacitance of Coaxial Infinite Cylinders?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The capacitance of coaxial infinite cylinders is determined by the formula that relates it to the natural logarithm of the ratio of their radii, specifically expressed as inversely proportional to Ln(r_{1}/r_{2}). To achieve an infinite capacitance, the lengths of the cylinders must be extended infinitely rather than minimizing the radii to zero, which leads to an indeterminate form. The discussion clarifies that the problem likely seeks the capacitance per unit length, which provides a finite solution despite the infinite nature of the cylinders.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and capacitance concepts
  • Familiarity with coaxial cable geometry
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic principles of limits and indeterminate forms in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance for coaxial cylinders using electrostatic principles
  • Learn about the concept of capacitance per unit length in cylindrical geometries
  • Explore the implications of infinite lengths in electrostatic problems
  • Review advanced calculus techniques for handling indeterminate forms
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and physicists interested in the theoretical aspects of capacitance in cylindrical geometries.

Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have two coaxial infinite cylinders and I must find their capacitance, where r_{1} < r_{2}

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I got an answer (for finite cylinders) that is inversely proportional to Ln (r_{1}/r_{2}).

Assuming this answer is correct (if someone can check it), in order to make it infinite the two radii have to become infinitesimally small (0) correct? If I do this though, I get an indeterminate in the argument of log.

Have I done this wrong or must I rewrite my expression in terms of some approximate expansion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Are you sure the problem isn't asking you for the capacitance per unit length?
 


I am sure. I don't see how significant that is either, since I would just divide my expression by l. But, the road block at the moment is trying to infinitesimally minimize the radii so as to give me a finite solution.
 


It's significant because the reason you get an infinite answer is because l is infinite. Typically, this type of question asks you for the capacitance per unit length, which is a finite number.
 


Void123 said:
in order to make it infinite the two radii have to become infinitesimally small (0) correct?

No, in order two make the two cylinders infinitely long, you just make them longer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K