Capacitance, voltage, distance and charge?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

When a capacitor connected to a battery has its plate separation doubled from D to 2D, the voltage remains constant while the capacitance decreases by a factor of two, as described by the formula C = ε₀A/D. Consequently, the charge on the capacitor also decreases, specifically halving from its initial value. The energy dynamics reveal that while the capacitor loses 1/4 C₀V² Joules, a net energy of 1/2 C₀V² Joules is returned to the battery, indicating a complex interaction of energy transfer during this process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor fundamentals, including capacitance and charge relationships.
  • Familiarity with the formula C = ε₀A/D and its implications.
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in electrical circuits.
  • Basic grasp of voltage, charge, and capacitance interrelationships through the equation Q = VC.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of varying plate separation on capacitor performance.
  • Investigate energy loss mechanisms in capacitors during charge and discharge cycles.
  • Learn about different types of capacitors and their applications in circuits.
  • Study the effects of dielectric materials on capacitance and energy storage.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding capacitor behavior in circuits, particularly in relation to voltage, charge, and energy dynamics.

seto6
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
NOT HOME WORK QUESTION!

If a capacitor is attached to a battery, initially the separation between the capacitor plates is D then the distance is doubled(2D). The voltage should remain the same because it is still attached to a battery. C=E0A/D so the capacitance decrease by factor of 2. my question is that since the capacitance decreased, the voltage or the charge must have decreased. so did the charge decrease or increase?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V remains the same, the charge on the capacitor halves.
 
my question is that since the capacitance decreased, the voltage or the charge must have decreased. so did the charge decrease or increase?
Yes the charge on the capacitor certainly did decrease. Exactly half of the initial charge did in fact flow back into the battery.

It's interesting to calculate the electrical energies involved in this case. It's relatively easy to show that a stored energy of \frac{1}{4} C_0 V^2 Joules was lost by the capacitor while a net energy of \frac{1}{2} C_0 V^2 Joules was returned to the battery.

I'll leave it as an exercise to figure out where the other \frac{1}{4} C_0 V^2 J of energy came from.
 
Last edited:
seto6 said:
NOT HOME WORK QUESTION!

If a capacitor is attached to a battery, initially the separation between the capacitor plates is D then the distance is doubled(2D). The voltage should remain the same because it is still attached to a battery. C=E0A/D so the capacitance decrease by factor of 2. my question is that since the capacitance decreased, the voltage or the charge must have decreased. so did the charge decrease or increase?

Charge, voltage and capacitance are related by the equation Q = VC, where Q is the charge on the plates of the capacitor, C is the capacitance of the capacitor, and V is the voltage dropped across the capacitor.

So if you double the plate separation distance, and you know that the capacitance is inversely related to that distance, then you must have cut the capacitance by half.

C = EOER(A/d) and if d is now 2d then C' = EOER(A/2d) = (1/2)C, so the new capacitance C' is 1/2 the old capacitance, C.

So, now plug that back into the function relating the voltage and capacitance to the charge on the plates. Let Q be the charge that was on the plates when the capacitor plates were separated by a distance, d, and let Q' be the charge on the plates by separating them by twice the distance:

Q = VC
Q' = V(1/2)C = (1/2)VC
Q' = (1/2)Q

The amount of charge on the plates by separating them by twice the distance they were separated at causes the charge on the plates to drop by half also.

Many Smiles,
Craig :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K