Calculating Capacitive Reactance for 10V, 2.5kHz, Sine Wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physixs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total current in a circuit with a 10V, 2.5kHz sine wave applied to a 0.01µF capacitor and a 10kΩ resistor. The initial approach incorrectly combined capacitive reactance and resistance linearly, leading to a calculated current of 0.611mA, which is significantly lower than the expected 0.844mA. It was clarified that capacitive reactance and resistance should be combined using the Pythagorean theorem due to their phase relationship, resulting in a total impedance calculation. The phase shift caused by the capacitor, where current leads voltage, was also discussed, emphasizing the role of imaginary numbers in reactance calculations. The conversation highlights the need for deeper understanding of AC circuit concepts, particularly when textbooks lack detailed explanations.
Physixs
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello again, I am trying to knock out some challenge questions in my text (to prepare for my midterms) and I came across this question.

A 10V, 2.5kHz, sine wave is applied to a series combination of a 0.01µF capacitor and a 10kΩ resistor. What would the total current be?

The answer in the back of the book says 0.844mA

I am not getting anything anywhere near that. Can someone please tell me where I am thinking incorrectly? Thanks.

Here is my thought process.

First, calculate the capacitive reactance: 1/2πfC = 1/(2πx2500x0.1x10^-6) = Xc = 6366.2Ω

This is where I think I am going wrong.
since the capacitor and the resistor are in series, so i added the capacitive reactance and resistance together: 6366.2 + 10,000 = 16,366.2Ω

I then applied ohm's law to get 10/16366.2 = 0.611mA which is way off

Using backwards design, I figured 10/0.844mA = 11,848Ω
which means that in some way shape or form, my total resistance in the circuit should be 11848Ω

I cannot figure out how to get my Xc of 6366.2Ω and resistor 10k to combine in a manner that would be 11848Ω

Any insight would be great!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to multiply Xc by the square root of -1 or something do you?
 
Drakkith said:
You don't need to multiply Xc by the square root of -1 or something do you?

I don't think so? Is there an equation or reason that I should? I don't think this chapter has had any mentioning of imaginary numbers. What was your idea?
 
Physixs said:
I don't think so? Is there an equation or reason that I should? I don't think this chapter has had any mentioning of imaginary numbers. What was your idea?

Nothing really, I just looked up Capacitive reactance on wiki and saw an equation using j, which is the square root of -1. But that thing was mentioning phasors and stuff, so I don't know.
 
Since the capacitive reactance and the resistance are at right angles, you need to use the squareroot of the sum of the squares to determine the magnitude of the sum. What is the magnitude of Z = R + jw/C.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
meBigGuy said:
Since the capacitive reactance and the resistance are at right angles, you need to use the squareroot of the sum of the squares to determine the magnitude of the sum. What is the magnitude of Z = R + jw/C.

Interesting. I just tried that out and you are absolutely correct! What worries me about this, is that the chapter section on capacitive reactance has NO MENTION of this and there are no sample problems like this. I will have to do some research to figure out why this is...

I can't even picture why they would be perpendicular to one another.

Maybe ill ask my TA again next week.
 
That's actually pretty easy. Reactance is modeled by (I hate this term) imaginary numbers, but in simple terms what happens is that there is a phase shift of 90 degrees between the voltage and current caused by the capacitor. The current through the capacitor leads the voltage (essentially it takes time to charge the capacitor) It is described nicely in this tutorial: http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/AC-capacitance.html and there is a nice diagram to demonstrate the effect.

Inductors have the same effect except the voltage leads the current.

BTW, for a series LC circuit when the lead in the inductor = the lag in the capacitor you get resonance and the impedance is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
meBigGuy said:
That's actually pretty easy. Reactance is modeled by (I hate this term) imaginary numbers, but in simple terms what happens is that there is a phase shift of 90 degrees between the voltage and current caused by the capacitor. The current through the capacitor leads the voltage (essentially it takes time to charge the capacitor) It is described nicely in this tutorial: http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/AC-capacitance.html and there is a nice diagram to demonstrate the effect.

Inductors have the same effect except the voltage leads the current.

BTW, for a series LC circuit when the lead in the inductor = the lag in the capacitor you get resonance and the impedance is zero.

That is perfect! I wish you wrote my textbook! Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K