Capacitor charging and discharging

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prince1281
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Charging
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the charging and discharging times of capacitor C2 in a circuit involving resistors R1, R2, and R3. Participants clarify that during charging, the switch connects to junction "a," allowing the use of only C2 and ignoring R3, while during discharging, the switch connects to junction "b," where C1 cannot be ignored as it is in parallel with C2. The total capacitance of C1 and C2 is determined to be 156 nF, which is essential for calculating the charging time using the relevant RC time constant equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RC circuits and time constants
  • Knowledge of capacitor behavior in parallel and series configurations
  • Familiarity with basic circuit simplification techniques
  • Ability to apply the formula for charging and discharging capacitors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of equivalent capacitance in parallel circuits
  • Learn how to calculate the time constant for RC circuits
  • Explore circuit simplification techniques for complex circuits
  • Review the principles of voltage distribution in parallel and series circuits
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, hobbyists working with circuits, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of capacitor charging and discharging dynamics.

Prince1281
Messages
26
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


1. In the circuit shown below calculate how long itwill take to charge the capacitor C2 to 4 V and how long it will take then to discharge it to 1V.
upload_2014-11-5_17-51-34.png

Homework Equations


upload_2014-11-5_17-51-53.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to solve it by taking t=0 when v=0 to get the k which is then ln(VBat). But I am confused if the resistance are connected in series or parallel? Can someone confirm. And for the C in RC do I take the total capacitance or just the C2? Please someone confirm. Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing for charging, the switch is connected to a and for discharging the switch is connected to b? Can you specify is that is the case?
 
I have no idea sir. This is exactly the information I have. I think its supposed to be some general case. I have weak understanding of this whole circuit concept.

Is the total resistance of the circuit R3+R2 then parallel with R1 or is it R1+R2+R3?
 
Well, I think it would be fair to assume the switch connects to the "a" junction only during charging and to the "b" junction only during discharging. But there could be a possibility for both "a" and "b" to be connected at the same time. Without knowing for sure which case we are talking about, we can't do this problem.

If indeed "a" is connected during charging and "b" is connected for discharging, you have two different circuits, can you draw the two different circuits?
 
So if its connected to junction a, we can ignore R3 right? can we ignore anything else for the charging part
 
Yes, for "a" you can ignore R3, and for "b" you can ignore the voltage source. That's the point of the switch really.

But the capacitors are connected in parallel, what can you do about that?
 
But it asks only for C2 so shouldn't C1 be ignored somehow?
 
You can't just ignore it...it's part of the circuit. But it is in parallel with C2, so that should tell you something! What do parallel circuit elements have in common?
 
Well capacitors got charge common when in parallel...Not sure how that helps. Explain please
 
  • #10
Charge on a capacitor is not equal when in parallel... any circuit elements in parallel has equal voltage across them.

Do you know how to simplify circuits?
 
  • #11
Matterwave said:
Charge on a capacitor is not equal when in parallel... any circuit elements in parallel has equal voltage across them.

Do you know how to simplify circuits?
Oh yeah man sorry you're right
I suck at simplifying...if I ignore r3 I will have capacitors in parallel. But what about resistors will they be in parallel too?

And also how does having same voltage help...
 
  • #12
Prince1281 said:
Oh yeah man sorry you're right
I suck at simplifying...if I ignore r3 I will have capacitors in parallel. But what about resistors will they be in parallel too?

And also how does having same voltage help...

The capacitors are in parallel, then the rest of the circuit is a series circuit. It seems that you are missing some very basic knowledge on circuits. I would suggest you go back and study the basics before trying to solve this more complicated problem.
 
  • #13
Matterwave said:
The capacitors are in parallel, then the rest of the circuit is a series circuit. It seems that you are missing some very basic knowledge on circuits. I would suggest you go back and study the basics before trying to solve this more complicated problem.
No its fine. I just don't understand how can I use only c2 when both the capacitors are in parallel. Just because they share same voltage does it mean I can ignore c1?
 
  • #14
Prince1281 said:
No its fine. I just don't understand how can I use only c2 when both the capacitors are in parallel. Just because they share same voltage does it mean I can ignore c1?

You can't ignore c1, but you can turn C1 and C2 into an equivalent capacitor.
 
  • #15
Matterwave said:
You can't ignore c1, but you can turn C1 and C2 into an equivalent capacitor.
 
  • #16

Yes we can combine the capacitors in parallel and get a total capacitance. So is the total capacitance to be used with the total resistance in the relevant equation that I uploaded for this problem in order to get the charging time. Please confirm. Thanks
 
  • #17
Do you know what is the value of a capacitor equivalent to C1 and C2 in parallel?
 
  • #18
Yeah its 156 nf.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
739
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K