What calculations should I perform for my capacitor discharge data in the lab?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating errors in capacitor discharge experiments, specifically using the time constant formula RC=t to determine capacitor values. Key considerations include the accuracy of resistance measurements, which should ideally be within 1% or 5%, and the precision of voltage and time readings. The use of a Wheatstone bridge for resistance measurement is recommended for improved accuracy. Additionally, increasing the number of trials beyond four can enhance the reliability of standard deviation calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RC time constant in capacitor circuits
  • Familiarity with resistance measurement techniques, including Wheatstone bridge
  • Knowledge of statistical analysis, particularly standard deviation
  • Experience with voltage and time measurement devices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of RC time constant in capacitor circuits
  • Learn about the Wheatstone bridge method for precise resistance measurement
  • Study statistical methods for calculating standard deviation in experimental data
  • Explore advanced voltage and time measurement techniques for improved accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers conducting capacitor discharge experiments, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in experimental physics or electronics who seeks to improve measurement accuracy and data analysis techniques.

Irishwolf
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi what type of calculation errors should i do for my data on the capacitance discharge experiment.

I had a voltage of 1.5V ,and I know the resistance, so the aim was to obtain the value of the capacitor, using the time constant RC=t formula.

I done 4 trials , with the same voltage, ( roughly) and resistance each time.

Should i do standard deviation etc??

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting question. I don't have a simple clear cut answer. I'm not sure there is one.

To begin, I'd note the accuracy of your resistance...is it, say, a 5% or a 1% rating. Did
you actually measure the resistance...what value(s) did you get, and what is the accuracy of your measuring device. If you used, say a volt-ohmmeter maybe you could get a more accurate reading via a wheatstone bridge. How does the resistance of your wires compare??
You should pick a large enough R to use so that the resistance of your wires is insignificant.


What's the meter accuracy for your voltage and time readings? How were those values determined? for example, did you observe the fall off of voltage and then check the time of zero voltage on a wrist watch...to within one second?? Or did you have, say, an automatic device which measures, say, milliseconds? If your measuring device accuracy is on the scale of your time constant, your readings will be very unreliable.

One way to get a rough idea of maximum error is the add all the variances in such a way that they all produce,say, increased values of your time constant. That won't happen much
is an actual experimental environment but nothing prevents it either.

You can get a better standard deviation by taking more than just four readings.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
25K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K