Capacitor Series Circuit: Deriving Cs Relationship

  • Thread starter Thread starter maulucci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a relationship for the equivalent capacitance (Cs) in a series circuit containing two capacitors and a resistor. Participants are exploring the implications of charge separation and voltage across capacitors in series.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the relationship between charge and voltage in series capacitors, questioning the assumption that charge is the same across both capacitors. Some are exploring the equations relating charge (q), capacitance (C), and voltage (V), while others are clarifying definitions of current and charge conservation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem, with some participants suggesting that the charge on capacitors in series must be equal, while others are questioning the assumptions made in the reasoning. Guidance has been offered regarding the correct application of equations for series and parallel configurations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of charge conservation and the definitions of current in the context of series circuits. There are indications of confusion regarding the application of equations typically used for parallel capacitors in a series context.

maulucci
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive a relationship for Cs for a two capacitor series circuit with a resistor. Start by showing that the same charge separation q is present across the capacitor and each of the capacitors in series and that the voltage across Cs is equal to the sum of the potential differences across each capacitor.


Homework Equations



1/Cs=(1/C1)+(1/C2)

The Attempt at a Solution



not sure how to approach this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If they are all in series what does that say about the current?

What is the definition of current?
 
I tried to work it out and i was wondering if this was the correct way to show wht the question is asking for
q1=C1V and q2=C2V
q=q1+q2=(C1+C2)V
CsV=q=(C1+C2)V
Cs=C1+C2
 
maulucci said:
q1=C1V and q2=C2V
q=q1+q2=(C1+C2)V
CsV=q=(C1+C2)V
Cs=C1+C2
This would apply to parallel capacitors, but not to capacitors in series.

The approach CWatters suggested gives you the correct equations for the charge.
 
maulucci said:
I tried to work it out and i was wondering if this was the correct way to show wht the question is asking for
q1=C1V and q2=C2V
q=q1+q2=(C1+C2)V <----
CsV=q=(C1+C2)V
Cs=C1+C2

It is a series circuit, and as the problem states, "...the same charge separation q is present across the capacitor and each of the capacitors". But writing q = q1 + q2 not only assumes that the charges are different, but that the current can be different in different components of a series circuit!

First you should argue why the charge separation should be the same on both capacitors. Then you can use that fact and the q = C*V relationship to work out the rest.

{Note: If you happen to have a knowledge of calculus you could write the KVL equation for the circuit (Integral version) and answer all the questions of the problem from its characteristics}
 
To show that they are equal charges q1=q2
And
q=Cs^-1V
q=(C1^-1+C2^-1)V
(C1^-1+C2^-1)V=Cs^-1V
Cs^-1=C1^-1+C2^-1
 
maulucci said:
To show that they are equal charges q1=q2
You did not show it, you just assumed it.

q=Cs^-1V
Why ^(-1)?

q=(C1^-1+C2^-1)V
How did you get that?

Your solution will need V1, V2 in some way...
 
Ok

V=q/C
V=V1+V2
q/C=q/C1+q/C2
C^-1=C1^-1+C2^-1
 
That is correct. You can argue that q1=q2 to satisfy charge conservation, or something similar.
 
  • #10
Ok thank you
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K