Car, gas and total energy calculation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the principle of conservation of energy in the context of a car's motion, specifically examining the total energy calculation that includes the energy from gasoline and exhaust. Participants explore the implications of including various energy forms in this calculation, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the total energy (Et) of a car can be expressed as the sum of kinetic energy (Ec) and potential energy (Ep), raising the question of how to incorporate the energy from gasoline and exhaust into this equation.
  • Another participant questions the clarity of the initial post and suggests that including the chemical potential energy of gasoline in the total energy calculation may be relevant, while considering the exhaust's chemical potential energy as negligible.
  • A different perspective is presented regarding the energy required to accelerate air into the car's intake, suggesting that this energy contributes to the aerodynamic drag and should be considered in the energy calculations.
  • One participant argues that a car moving at constant speed on flat ground does not conserve energy, implying that energy is lost in this scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance and treatment of exhaust energy and the conservation of energy in the context of a car's motion. There is no consensus on how to approach the total energy calculation, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions, such as the treatment of exhaust gases and the conditions under which energy conservation applies. The discussion reflects a lack of clarity regarding the definitions and calculations involved in the energy analysis.

jeanmarc69
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

What I understood about the principle of conservation of energy: Et = Ep + Ec = constant.
For example: Et = 1/2mv^2 + mgh (h = height).

Consider a car moving at speed v.

For example: Et = 1/2mv^2 + E(gas + exhausts). Indeed, I include the exhausts, otherwise with the drop in the quantity of gas necessary to drive the car, there is an imbalance, therefore no conservation.

My question: What would be the algebra for E(gas + exhaust) in the context of Et?

Thank you for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow, it's hard for me to decode your post. What are ##E_p## and ##E_c##? What are you trying to calculate? Are you trying to add the chemical potential energy of gasoline into a total energy calculation for a car? If so, the chemical potential energy of the exhaust can be taken as zero. If you have a turbofan driving the car, then I suppose you could include the exit momentum of the exhaust in the energy equations, but otherwise it makes little sense to worry about the exhaust gasses from a car, IMO.
 
jeanmarc69 said:
My question: What would be the algebra for E(gas + exhaust) in the context of Et?
The air, taken in through the air filter of a car, must be first accelerated to the speed of the car. The energy required would normally appear as part of the aerodynamic drag of the vehicle. The fuel in the tank of the car would appear to be part of the mass of the vehicle.

The nitrogen in the air would be heated before being released as exhaust. The oxygen would be combusted with fuel, to be exhausted as hot H2O and CO2.

The exhaust gasses of piston-engined aircraft were directed backwards to gain a few HP of forward thrust. That 'jet' effect would also be true for cars, but is not as important as it once was in military aircraft.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Your math makes little sense to me too, but please note a car moving at constant speed on flat ground is not a situation where energy is conserved: 100% of it is lost.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K