1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Curiosity on conservation of energy

  1. Feb 9, 2015 #1
    Imagine a ball rolling down a hill or inclined plane without slipping from a particular height.
    The conservation of energy law says that the final energy remains the same as the initial energy.
    But, when a ball is rolling without slipping, there must be a friction.
    So, what I think is
    E = E'
    mgh + Ffriction s = (1/2) mv^2 + (1/2) Iω^w

    But, in every book I read says that
    E = E'
    mgh = (1/2) mv^2 + (1/2) Iω^w

    Why is there no work done by friction ?
    I questioned this since if the ball is not rolling, it must be mgh + Ffriction s = (1/2)mv^2
    But, when it's rolling, there is no work done by friction.. Why?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 9, 2015 #2

    A.T.

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    no slipping -> static friction -> displacement of force application point is zero (in the ground frame) -> no work done
     
  4. Feb 9, 2015 #3
    The model is assuming that the motion is exhibiting pure roll and that there is no rolling friction (caused by hysteresis). Under these idealized conditions no work is done by friction or internal forces.

    Static friction is necessary to develop rolling motion (otherwise it would just slide), but does not transfer any energy.
     
  5. Feb 9, 2015 #4
    Why the displacement of frictional force is zero ?
    Is the tangential velocity at the point where the ball touches the ground zero ?
    Why ? It rolls and makes some distance, right ? The tangential velocity is α r , right ? It's not static, right ?
     
  6. Feb 10, 2015 #5

    A.T.

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    If the contact point doesn't slip, then it must be have the same horizontal velocity as the surface.

    The tangential velocity is not the total velocity of the contact point in the ground frame. But it is In the frame of the wheel's center, where static friction is indeed doing work.
     
  7. Feb 11, 2015 #6

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Just for the record, this remains valid. A more general theorem, of which this is an example, can be written as (at least for constant forces):
    $$F_{net}\Delta x_{cm}=\Delta (\frac{1}{2}m v_{cm}^2)$$
    Just do not confuse this as a statement of energy conservation, which it is not. Here's something that I wrote in an older thread about this concept, which you might find helpful:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Curiosity on conservation of energy
  1. Conservation of Energy? (Replies: 15)

  2. Conservation of Energy (Replies: 5)

  3. Conservation of Energy (Replies: 2)

  4. Conservation of energy (Replies: 7)

Loading...