Car negotiating a banked curve - centripetal force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a car negotiating a banked curve, focusing on centripetal force and the calculation of optimum, maximum, and minimum speeds. Participants are exploring the dynamics of motion on a banked curve, particularly in the context of frictional forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss how to calculate the minimum speed required for a car on a banked curve, questioning the direction of frictional forces in different scenarios. There is also consideration of how to represent the trajectory of the car at maximum speed with kinetic friction involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the conditions under which the car may slip and the implications of friction direction. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the minimum speed and the role of friction, but no consensus has been reached on the final calculations or representations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of free body diagrams and the effects of different coefficients of friction, while also addressing the conditions under which the car may slip or maintain its path on the banked curve.

frasifrasi
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
Car negotiating a banked curve -- centripetal force

We were asked to calculate the optimum (no friction), maximum, and minimum speeds alowed for a car making a banked curve.

I calculated the optimum and maximum velocities using the provided angle, radius, and coefficient of static firction. But how am i supposed to calculate the minimum speed? Should I set the frictional force in the free body diagram pointing towards the bank(outside of curve)? Any suggestions?

Also, we are asked to draw the trajectory of the car going at maximum speed given a coefficient of kinetic friction. Since the friction equations are the same, should I just plug in this coefficient of kinetic friction in place of the old coefficient of static friction?

lastly, would it be right to set the path going toward the wall, and crasing like I imagine it to be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You say:But how am i supposed to calculate the minimum speed?
You can draw a free body diagram. And then see under what conditions the car slips down the banked curve. After that you can think about minimum velocity that will cause a centrifugal force.
 
Let's stop the car. If the car is at rest, it means that the minimum velocity is zero. Related with the angle of inclination the car can slip down or does not move. So under the condition of slipping there must be a minimum velocity so that the car does not slip.
 
I think they mean the minumum velocity for the car not to slip, hence why it cannot be 0. Would it make sense to just switch the direction of friction on the free body diagram?

Also, we are asked to draw the trajectory of the car going at maximum speed given a coefficient of kinetic friction. Since the friction equations are the same, should I just plug in this coefficient of kinetic friction in place of the old coefficient of static friction?
 
frasifrasi said:
I calculated the optimum and maximum velocities using the provided angle, radius, and coefficient of static firction. But how am i supposed to calculate the minimum speed? Should I set the frictional force in the free body diagram pointing towards the bank(outside of curve)?
The friction force in the case of minimum speed is in one direction (which?) while in the case of maximum speed it is in the opposite direction. Play around with a free body diagram until that clicks.
 
I said that the direction of friction the maximum velocity was toward the center. If the minimum is the opposite, should it be toward the bank (like i thought)?

Can you confirm this?

Also, can anyone help me with the last questions?
 
frasifrasi said:
I said that the direction of friction the maximum velocity was toward the center. If the minimum is the opposite, should it be toward the bank (like i thought)?

Can you confirm this?
You are correct. This should make sense. Imagine no friction. If you go too fast, you'll slide up the ramp; too slow, down the ramp. Friction acts to prevent such sliding.

Also, can anyone help me with the last questions?
Not sure what they are looking for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K