Career Advice(The bout between Physics and Engineering)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison between pursuing a career in Physics versus Engineering, focusing on the nature of each field, academic paths, and potential career outcomes. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of both disciplines, as well as the differences in educational experiences and job prospects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Physics is more research-oriented while Engineering is more industrial, though there are overlaps where both fields collaborate on projects.
  • There is a discussion about the similarities and differences in the lives of professionals in both fields, with some noting a pay gap that can vary based on specific roles.
  • Participants mention that studying Physics tends to be more theoretical, while Engineering is more experimental, although both fields involve a mix of theory and practice.
  • Some suggest looking into programs that combine Physics and Engineering, such as engineering physics or applied physics, as a way to pursue interests in both areas.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of double majoring in both fields, with recommendations for taking advanced placement courses to prepare for college-level work.
  • Questions arise regarding specific job roles and projects in fields like experimental physics, nuclear engineering, and aerospace engineering, as well as the job market for each discipline.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views, with some agreeing on the general characteristics of each field while others highlight the nuances and variations within them. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best academic path and the implications of pursuing dual interests in Physics and Engineering.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the job market and pay scales can change over time, which may affect the relevance of advice given. Additionally, the necessity of a head start for double majoring is emphasized, but the specific requirements and implications remain a topic of discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a career in Physics or Engineering, particularly those in high school exploring their academic paths and future job prospects.

Mind_of_BP
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm new here and currently a 10th grader, and unlike many of my friends I've known what I want to be since the 4th grade, only it's an endless bout between the two heavyweights of Physics and Engineering. Math has always come fairly naturally to me and have never gotten less than an "A" in the subject and my science classes are the same way. So I have a few questions,
1) I've always assumed that physics is more researched oriented while engineering is (for lack of a better word) industrial. Is this the reality?
2) Can someone explain the lives of both of these professions?
3) How will studying both of these fields differ?
4) Finally (for now) how would you suggest a possible academic path (dual major, on of those 5-year accelerated programs, choosing one, etc.)

Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mind_of_BP said:
Hello,
I'm new here and currently a 10th grader, and unlike many of my friends I've known what I want to be since the 4th grade, only it's an endless bout between the two heavyweights of Physics and Engineering. Math has always come fairly naturally to me and have never gotten less than an "A" in the subject and my science classes are the same way. So I have a few questions,
1) I've always assumed that physics is more researched oriented while engineering is (for lack of a better word) industrial. Is this the reality?
2) Can someone explain the lives of both of these professions?
3) How will studying both of these fields differ?
4) Finally (for now) how would you suggest a possible academic path (dual major, on of those 5-year accelerated programs, choosing one, etc.)

Thanks so much!

1) You could say physics is more blue skies oriented, meaning that physicists acquire knowledge about the universe for the sake of the knowledge itself. Engineering is about using established science to make useful products. There's places where this intersects, engineering is full of research in order to make better products, and there's plenty of physicists making engineering systems in order to acquire data more efficiently.
2) I would say they're very similar (except for a pay gap between the two depending on the type of physics/engineering you're doing and the politics going on).
3) Studying the two involve calculus, differential equations, linear algebra, probability, statistics, computer programming and the relevant science for your discipline. A physics undergrad is more theoretical while an engineering undergrad is more experimental (though you do both theory and experiment in both).
4) If you want to do both in some way look at programs that call themselves engineering physics or applied physics, they have the combination of a physics undergrad and an engineering undergrad built into the program. What you choose depends on what you want to do after and how much you like it. Some people really like mathematical rigour and derivations with their physics and they become mathematicians or theoreticians; some like playing with toys and become experimental physicists or they become engineers (depends on whether they like 'pure' or 'applied' science).
 
Both can be academic and both can be industrial. Physics can be theoretical or it can be applied. Applied is not necessarily at the depth of applied engineering. Engineering explores many topics now from mechanical systems to electronic systems to nanotechnology and robotics.

Read about them on Wikipedia to see the range of topics then look at where your interests lie and see which field lines up more.

On many exotic projects physics researchers and engineers will often work together. Some examples would be the space telescope projects or the space station.
 
I certainly enjoy the more hands on environment that comes with experimental physics and I'm leaning towards such. However (and sorry for another question) what would be some real world jobs/projects/experiments that one would undertake? And on another note what's the pay difference in the two?
 
By the time you get out the pay will have changed to make any advice here totally obsolete, but now they are comparable when you can find a physics job in industry. Engineering depends on your major, right now petroleum engineers are in big demand. There are definitely more engineering jobs in industry. Defense industries use a lot of applied physicisits.
 
Last edited:
1. Generally true, but you can go to industry with physics, and vice versa you can do research in engineering.
2. Sorry, I can't tell you too much.
3. They don't differ a lot the first two years. But for physics, you need to have grad school in mind, so you will have to do a lot of research. For engineering, you need to have employment in mind so you will work a lot on professional/technical skills and perhaps internships.
4. Generally speaking, double majors aren't recommended, since you don't get to specialize in a single field. 5-year accelerated programs are much preferred in both employment and grad school admissions I think.
But if you plan to double major, I suggest you start preparing now: try to take as much college credit classes as possible (AP, dual enrollment, community college) so that you are ahead when you enter college. The classes I recommend are AP physics both mechanics and electromagnetism, and AP calc BC, which are the physics and math for freshmen physics/engineering majors. If you decide to go further, you can also take from a community college physics 3, linear algebra, and differential equations, which are sophomore material. This head start will help you double major more easily.
The necessity of a head start in double majoring I must emphasize, as the concern with double majoring without a head start is that it will force another year or two of undergraduate studies, which is a lot of money and on top of that financial aid gets canceled after 4 years I believe. On an accelerated program, the head start isn't as necessary (although it is always good). I recommend just getting good grades and getting involved in engineering communities/societies/events, internships, and making valuable connections.
 
Ok, what kinds of research would a say nuclear or aerospace engineer do? Also, can someone tell me smaller D1 schools or any D2, D3, or NAIA school that are considered well respected in these fields, as I'm a track runner and probably not fast enough to race at the big powerhouses that have the great programs, but will probably be able to run elsewhere. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K