Career Flexibility a thing of the Past

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of career flexibility within the engineering profession, particularly in the context of job market dynamics and the specificity of job requirements. Participants explore whether engineers can maintain a generalist role or if they are increasingly forced into specialized positions due to industry demands and hiring practices.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the demand for highly specific skills has made it difficult for engineers to remain generalists, with many job postings requiring niche expertise.
  • Others argue that while companies list detailed requirements, these are often more like wishlists, and capable candidates can still find opportunities if they can demonstrate their skills effectively.
  • A participant notes that the rise of HR regulations has led to a more bureaucratic hiring process, potentially sidelining qualified candidates who lack specific keywords in their applications.
  • Concerns are raised about the impact of job postings that specify degrees or experiences that may not align with a candidate's background, limiting mobility within the field.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of networking and leveraging connections to find job opportunities, suggesting that many positions are filled through referrals rather than traditional applications.
  • There is a shared sentiment of frustration regarding the perceived loss of flexibility in career paths, with some expressing disappointment that the engineering field no longer offers the broad spectrum of job opportunities they expected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the extent to which engineers can transition between roles. While some believe that it is still possible to migrate within the field, others feel that the specificity of job requirements significantly limits this flexibility. The discussion remains unresolved with competing views on the impact of HR practices and job market conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the hiring process, including the reliance on specific qualifications and keywords, which may not accurately reflect a candidate's capabilities. There is also mention of the evolving nature of job roles and the influence of regulatory changes on hiring practices.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineering professionals navigating career transitions, HR specialists involved in recruitment, and individuals considering entering the engineering field.

koab1mjr
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I am just throwing this out there to fish for opinions

Engineering is often advertised as a broad profession offering many opportunities. With tight labor markets where there is an over supply of job seekers is this no longer a true statement. I ask because workers must be responsive to the tides in industry. As some sectors cool off it is beneficial to migrate to hotter areas.

The problem is companies are demanding very specific skills. Its rare that you see a blanket 5 10 20 yr experience requirement without a caveat for something specific like 5 yrs 2 phase deep sea flow in pipes modeling or something.

Are people basically forced into being labeled as specific type of engineer?

Does one have to "start from the bottom" to migrate to a different field within the discipline?

Is it possible to stay an generalist and not be reduced to a project manager?

Thanks in advance for comments ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's what I think happened: As a side effect of anti-discrimination laws of all sorts, companies were required to document exactly what certifications and experience was required to do a job. The days when someone could look you in the eye, discuss a few technical subjects and then subjectively declare you fit for the job are gone. This is not such a bad thing. It definitely helps to level the playing field for everyone.

However, a side effect of this effort is that it pigeon-holes people into specialties if they want to get paid well. It also makes everyone go looking for certificates that only prove that you know how to pass a test and that you had all the right check marks from all the right agencies. The certification industry and educational institutions are making a killing training people for all sorts of things that didn't even exist before.

I keep saying this and I still think it is true: Human Resource Specialists used to be called Personnel Clerks. There is no way these former clerks will understand experiential knowledge. For example, someone who spent a lot of time designing HVAC gear might also do very well designing pressurization systems for aircraft. Good Luck proving that to an HR specialist.

We probably lose many qualified candidates because they do not include the proper key words that these people are trained to look for. So they often outsource their services to head-hunting firms who do understand the field.

Thus, my answer is that you are probably right. Unless you find some way to squirrel yourself around the HR gauntlet, the chances of you applying your wits to another field of interest are slim to none. Alternatively, you can work for a company that is too small to care about HR regulations.

I really can't see any way around this. This is a bureaucratic solution to a social problem. The social problem couldn't be fixed directly, so this is what happened. I hope someone sorts this mess out some day, but I fear that it may be a long time before that happens.
 
no. companies are required to put out though ultra detailed 'requirements' but they are much closer to wishlists. if you are capable of doing the job and can convince them of that, you will be hired so long as mr.perfect never applies (which he usually doesn't.)

senior engineers are retiring everywhere. companies are being forced to accept 'under-qualified' workers, they just don't like to admit it. Obviously you will need to prove yourseld if you are jumping disciplines but migrating within your field is possible and if you gain other engineering experience while doing it that only opens more doors.
 
Thanks for the reply

It stinks because being married one needs flexibility to follow the spouse. I am currently in a flow modeling group. I figured modeling multi phase flow has broad applications. Gas, any type of chemical plant etc... The problem is you read job postings and they will specify a specific degree which mine will never fit NE. So i am kind of up the river.

I thnk the answer is to put together a network of head hunters. Its depressing, I went into engineering because of the broad spectrum of jobs and that every so often i can change it around without starting from nothing. Doesn't appear to be the case any more.
 
koab1mjr said:
Thanks for the reply

It stinks because being married one needs flexibility to follow the spouse. I am currently in a flow modeling group. I figured modeling multi phase flow has broad applications. Gas, any type of chemical plant etc... The problem is you read job postings and they will specify a specific degree which mine will never fit NE. So i am kind of up the river.

I thnk the answer is to put together a network of head hunters. Its depressing, I went into engineering because of the broad spectrum of jobs and that every so often i can change it around without starting from nothing. Doesn't appear to be the case any more.

Do you know people who do the kind of work you are seeking? You can change somewhat but it is easier *within* a job than it is to convince someone to pay you to do something you haven't done before.

I think the best way would be to look through your network to try to find an in at an organization that does the kind of work you want. Once you get to a high technical level, job postings are not a good way to look for work. The vast majority of good positions are filled by people that have been referred to them (sometimes through a headhunter, but often not)
 
physicsboard said:
no. companies are required to put out though ultra detailed 'requirements' but they are much closer to wishlists. if you are capable of doing the job and can convince them of that, you will be hired so long as mr.perfect never applies (which he usually doesn't.)

You won't even get called in for an interview if you're missing some key words.

I tried applying for a job posting at Boeing a few minutes ago.

http://jobs-boeing.com/washington/t...est-﹠-evaluation-laboratory-technician-1-jobs

With my lab experience, I figured I'd be a shoe-in. Except they specifically ask you if you've done any sort of "additive machining" stuff. I haven't. I have all the other necessary skills and experience. I figure that's the part they could teach me in a week. So what do I do? Do I lie and then get asked about it during the interview? Or do I just hit "no", get told I can't even apply, and then go do something else?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
26K