Careers Outside Academia Richly Rewarding for PhD Physicists

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion highlights that over 75% of physicists in the private sector earned more than $100,000 a decade after obtaining their PhDs, as reported in 2011. These physicists find their roles intellectually stimulating and rewarding, often collaborating with diverse professionals. However, the report's findings should be contextualized within the economic climate of the early 2000s, particularly the dotcom boom and subsequent downturns, which may have influenced job availability and salary trends for physicists. The conversation also critiques the sustainability of R&D positions during economic downturns, emphasizing the need for further research on this topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of private sector employment trends for PhD physicists
  • Knowledge of the economic impacts of the dotcom boom and bust
  • Familiarity with salary benchmarks in academia versus industry
  • Awareness of R&D funding dynamics during economic fluctuations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research salary trends for physicists in the private sector post-2008 economic downturn
  • Examine the impact of the dotcom boom on STEM employment rates
  • Investigate R&D funding strategies during economic recessions
  • Analyze the long-term career trajectories of physicists transitioning from academia to industry
USEFUL FOR

PhD physicists considering career options outside academia, industry recruiters, and policymakers interested in STEM workforce trends and economic impacts on research and development.

Choppy
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
5,016
Reaction score
2,555
(Title should read "for" PhD Physicists... I can't type today)

From Science Daily:
According to the report, in 2011 more than three‐quarters of physicists working in the private sector earned in excess of $100,000 a decade after receiving their doctorates -- many enjoying salaries higher than their academic counterparts.

Private sector physicists also identified their jobs as intellectually stimulating, challenging and rewarding because they regularly worked with smart and interesting people from a wider range of backgrounds.

The one graint of salt to take this report with is the fact that 10-15 years before 2011, was well into the dotcom boom, where physics PhDs were aggressively recruited for their number crunching skills. It would be interesting to look at a similar study for a period that incorporates the economic downturn after 2008.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A point of disagreement: The economic downturn occurred in 2000, driven by PCs and internet speculation, compounded with speculative trading, on expectation of increasing value, driven by the same technology: the personal computer and the internet. It was a double hit delivered upon greed, no different than the 1920s.

In 2004, crap Chinese nock-offs were still flying off the shelves at Walmart. It was like nightmare, watching a slow motion train wreck, unable to run away with my legs stuck in molassses.

Various politically driven federal economic patches, doomed to failure, were implement to recovery from the 1990s feeding frenzy, notably the housing crisis. Boom, bust. The piper wasn't paid, and the debt was deferred, but increased through bad federal management.

Now, it's been my experience that a standing R&D staff is not something maintained, for long, by an economic sector during an economic downturn within that sector. I haven't done any research on this, so I take this as premise until shown otherwise.

It makes $ sense. Why throw resources into a better beaver trap when the market for beaver skins is stagnant or declining.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
19K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
60
Views
31K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
69K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
26K