I Carlo Rovelli, loop quantum gravity and point particles

TheHeraclitus
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
How are particles described in loop quantum gravity?
I am reading a popular-science book Reality Is Not What It Seems by Carlo Rovelli, one of the founders of loop quantum gravity.
He writes:
The nodes of the graph represent the discrete packets of volume and, as in the case of photons, can only have certain sizes, which can be computed using Dirac's general quantum equation. Every node n in the graph has its own volume vn: one of the numbers in the spectrum of the volume.
and
The nodes are the elementary quanta of which physical space is made. Every node of the graph is a "quantum particle of space".
and
the gravitational field is space. Space is no longer different from matter. It is one of the "material" components of the world, akin to the electromagnetic field. It is a real entity which undulates, fluctuates, bends and contorts.

So basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others, and the quanta of this field is the nod. Nods have volume, which means they must be extended in dimensions, they must have shape. But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles, they have no volume. It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.

Rovelli also claims there is minimum length in nature, but point particles would be smaller, they are dimensionless.

So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Particles are "pointlike" in standard quantum field theory in the sense that their wavelength can be arbitrarily small. But this is a problem of standard theory, because it leads to UV divergences. According to loop quantum gravity, particles are actually not "pointlike" in that sense, which is a sort of improvement over the standard theory. But note that it is a popular-level explanation, similar to the book you have been reading, so should be taken with a grain of salt.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, ohwilleke and malawi_glenn
TheHeraclitus said:
Summary: How are particles described in loop quantum gravity?

I am reading a popular-science book Reality Is Not What It Seems by Carlo Rovelli, one of the founders of loop quantum gravity.
He writes:

and

andSo basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others, and the quanta of this field is the nod. Nods have volume, which means they must be extended in dimensions, they must have shape. But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles, they have no volume. It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.

Rovelli also claims there is minimum length in nature, but point particles would be smaller, they are dimensionless.

So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
One big difficulty with a node-like model of space-time is that this can give rise of Lorentz violations (i.e. deviations from special relativity) if taken too literally. But, this problem is not, in general, a problem with all models in which there is a minimum length that do not rigidly try to fit space-time into a fixed discrete network.
 
TheHeraclitus said:
So basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others
The other fields are defined at each point on spacetime. How can spacetime be a field defined on itself?

TheHeraclitus said:
But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles.
They aren't. Especially the photon! They are states of the relevant quantum field.
TheHeraclitus said:
It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.
Given it's not part of the theory it may well be absurd!
TheHeraclitus said:
So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
He doesn't have to, as point particles are not part of quantum field theory.
 
Last edited:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Back
Top