Carlo Rovelli, loop quantum gravity and point particles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of particles in loop quantum gravity as presented by Carlo Rovelli in his book "Reality Is Not What It Seems." Participants explore the implications of Rovelli's claims regarding the nature of space, quanta, and the distinction between point particles and extended particles within the framework of loop quantum gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights Rovelli's assertion that space is a quantum field with discrete packets of volume, which challenges the notion of point particles in other fields.
  • Another participant notes that while standard quantum field theory describes particles as pointlike, loop quantum gravity proposes that particles are not pointlike, suggesting an improvement over standard theory.
  • A participant raises concerns about the implications of a node-like model of spacetime potentially leading to violations of Lorentz invariance if interpreted too rigidly.
  • There is a contention regarding the classification of particles, with one participant asserting that particles like photons are states of quantum fields rather than point particles.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the coherence of having extended particles in the gravitational field while other fields consist of point particles.
  • A later reply suggests that Rovelli does not need to address point particles, as they are not a component of quantum field theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of particles in loop quantum gravity and the implications of Rovelli's claims. There is no consensus on how these concepts reconcile with established theories or the validity of the interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of particles and fields, as well as unresolved questions regarding the implications of a minimum length in nature and its compatibility with point particles.

TheHeraclitus
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
How are particles described in loop quantum gravity?
I am reading a popular-science book Reality Is Not What It Seems by Carlo Rovelli, one of the founders of loop quantum gravity.
He writes:
The nodes of the graph represent the discrete packets of volume and, as in the case of photons, can only have certain sizes, which can be computed using Dirac's general quantum equation. Every node n in the graph has its own volume vn: one of the numbers in the spectrum of the volume.
and
The nodes are the elementary quanta of which physical space is made. Every node of the graph is a "quantum particle of space".
and
the gravitational field is space. Space is no longer different from matter. It is one of the "material" components of the world, akin to the electromagnetic field. It is a real entity which undulates, fluctuates, bends and contorts.

So basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others, and the quanta of this field is the nod. Nods have volume, which means they must be extended in dimensions, they must have shape. But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles, they have no volume. It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.

Rovelli also claims there is minimum length in nature, but point particles would be smaller, they are dimensionless.

So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Particles are "pointlike" in standard quantum field theory in the sense that their wavelength can be arbitrarily small. But this is a problem of standard theory, because it leads to UV divergences. According to loop quantum gravity, particles are actually not "pointlike" in that sense, which is a sort of improvement over the standard theory. But note that it is a popular-level explanation, similar to the book you have been reading, so should be taken with a grain of salt.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, ohwilleke and malawi_glenn
TheHeraclitus said:
Summary: How are particles described in loop quantum gravity?

I am reading a popular-science book Reality Is Not What It Seems by Carlo Rovelli, one of the founders of loop quantum gravity.
He writes:

and

andSo basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others, and the quanta of this field is the nod. Nods have volume, which means they must be extended in dimensions, they must have shape. But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles, they have no volume. It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.

Rovelli also claims there is minimum length in nature, but point particles would be smaller, they are dimensionless.

So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
One big difficulty with a node-like model of space-time is that this can give rise of Lorentz violations (i.e. deviations from special relativity) if taken too literally. But, this problem is not, in general, a problem with all models in which there is a minimum length that do not rigidly try to fit space-time into a fixed discrete network.
 
TheHeraclitus said:
So basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others
The other fields are defined at each point on spacetime. How can spacetime be a field defined on itself?

TheHeraclitus said:
But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles.
They aren't. Especially the photon! They are states of the relevant quantum field.
TheHeraclitus said:
It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.
Given it's not part of the theory it may well be absurd!
TheHeraclitus said:
So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
He doesn't have to, as point particles are not part of quantum field theory.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K