Cartesian Convention of Displacement Vectors.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the time taken for a body dropped from height H to strike an inclined plane at height h. The correct answer is established as h = H/2, derived from the equation t = sqrt(2(H-h)/g) + sqrt(2h/g) and finding the maximum time by taking the derivative. The confusion arises from the varying choice of origin for displacement vectors, which can affect the interpretation of motion parameters. A clarification is provided that there is only one origin, which should be considered at ground level for consistency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically x = x0 + ut + (1/2)at^2
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (g) and its impact on falling bodies
  • Familiarity with the concept of displacement vectors and their origins
  • Basic calculus for finding maxima and minima (differentiation)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations in different contexts
  • Learn about the implications of choosing different origins in physics problems
  • Explore the concept of displacement vectors and their significance in motion analysis
  • Investigate the principles of projectile motion and inclined planes in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics and dynamics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to displacement and motion analysis.

Hijaz Aslam
Messages
66
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Q.[/B] A body dropped from a height H above the ground strikes an inclined plane at a height h above the ground. As a result of the impact, the velocity of the body becomes horizontal. The body will take the maximum time to reach the ground if :

(a) ##h=\frac H4## (b) ##h=\frac H{2\sqrt{2}}## (c) ##h=\frac H2## (d) ##h=\frac H{\sqrt{2}}##


Homework Equations



##h=ut-\frac{gt}{2}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I've got the answer as ##H/2## and my text marks the answer valid.
By taking ##t=t_1+t_2##. And taking ##t_1=\sqrt{\frac{2(H-h)}{g}}## and ##t_2=\sqrt{\frac{2h}{g}}##. And taking
the differential coefficient of ##t=\sqrt{\frac{2(H-h)}{g}}+\sqrt{\frac{2h}{g}}## and equating it to 0, gives the value of ##h=\frac{H}{2}##.

But I am confused about the direction of the entities involved in the motion. Here initially we take the origin as the point where we drop the body, taking 'up' as positive and 'down' as negative. But in the second case we consider the point where the body strikes the inclined plane as the origin and as in the former case 'up' as+ve and 'down' as -ve. But doesn't this variation in the origin in both the cases dismantle the final information about the motion, its time,height,velocity etc.

This doubt is related to my previous thread( https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-not-touching-the-origin.778009/#post-4891774 ). Though I got a partially satisfactory answer for that question, the above question confuses me again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hijaz Aslam said:
But I am confused about the direction of the entities involved in the motion. Here initially we take the origin as the point where we drop the body, taking 'up' as positive and 'down' as negative. But in the second case we consider the point where the body strikes the inclined plane as the origin and as in the former case 'up' as+ve and 'down' as -ve. But doesn't this variation in the origin in both the cases dismantle the final information about the motion, its time,height,velocity etc.

There is only one origin .In this problem you may consider it to be on ground .

I think you are using the equation ## x = ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2 ## .

The correct form is ## x = x_0 + ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2 ## ,where ##x_0## is the initial displacement. Use this with appropriate signs and you will get the correct answer .

Hope this helps .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K