Castigliano's Second Theorem on Curved Structures

  • Thread starter Thread starter Triskelion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structures Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying Castigliano's Second Theorem to determine the horizontal displacement of a roller support in a semi-circular ring structure under a vertical load F. The participant outlines their approach using moment equations M1 and M2, derived from the applied horizontal force H. A critical error was identified regarding the reaction forces, which led to confusion over the negative sign in the displacement result. The resolution involved recognizing the oversight of reaction forces, clarifying the calculations, and confirming the correct interpretation of the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Castigliano's Theorem
  • Familiarity with moment equations in structural analysis
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams
  • Basic principles of mechanics of materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Castigliano's Theorem applications in various structural scenarios
  • Learn about free body diagram techniques for complex structures
  • Explore the implications of reaction forces in structural analysis
  • Review moment distribution methods in structural engineering
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in analyzing curved structures and applying Castigliano's Theorem in practical scenarios.

Triskelion
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A semi-circular ring of stiffness EI and radius R is supported on an anchored hinge and on a roller hinge. A vertical load F is applied at the center. Determine the horizontal displacement of the roller support.
62QT1EH.jpg


Homework Equations


vVmJPC5.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


So I apply a horizontal force H (to the right) at the roller. Sectioning the first quadrant gives M_1=HR sinθ_1 (moment is taken as positive clockwise). So \frac{∂M_1}{∂H}=R sinθ_1. Similarly, M_2=HR cosθ_2-FRsinθ_2 and \frac{∂M_2}{∂H}=R cosθ_2. Because H is an imaginary load and setting it to 0, M_1=0, \frac{∂M_1}{∂H}=R sinθ_1, M_2=-FRsinθ_2 and \frac{∂M_2}{∂H}=R cosθ_2. So the integral is \int_0^ \frac{π}{2} \frac{M_1}{EI} \frac{∂M_1}{∂H}R dθ_1 + \int_0^ \frac{π}{2} \frac{M_2}{EI} \frac{∂M_2}{∂H}R dθ_2. The first integral is zero. The second gives \int_0^ \frac{π}{2} \frac{-FR^3}{2EI} sin2θ_2 dθ_2=\frac{-FR^3}{2EI}. I checked my workings, and I have no idea why there is a negative sign there. If my understanding is correct, the negative sign implies roller movement to the left, and this is really counter intuitive. Can anyone shed some light on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be clearer if you include a free body diagram for the derivation of your equations but my first comment is that M2 doesn't seem right.
 
paisiello2 said:
It might be clearer if you include a free body diagram for the derivation of your equations but my first comment is that M2 doesn't seem right.
Hey, thank you for the hint. It was like an epiphany. Turns out that I've forgotten the reaction forces all along. Funny how the human mind works, one can keep checking the thing for days without figuring what's wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
52K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
35K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K