MHB Cathode & Anode: Explaining the Difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Anode Cathode
AI Thread Summary
In a cathode ray discharge tube, the cathode is the negative electrode, while the anode is the positive electrode. In a direct current circuit, the anode is the negatively charged terminal of a voltaic cell, which supplies current, while the cathode is the positively charged terminal. Current flows away from the cathode, leading to the mnemonic "CCD: Cathode Current Departs," even though negative electrons are the actual charge carriers. The cathode connects to the negative pole of the power source, allowing positive charge to flow from the cathode into the power source. This confusion stems from historical misassignments of positive and negative charges by early scientists.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
Hello,

In cathode ray discharge tube,negative electrode is cathode and positive electrode is anode.

But in case of direct current circuit, it is the positively charged terminal of a voltaic cell or storage battery that supplies current and anode is the negatively charged terminal of a voltaic cell or storage battery that supplies current.

Why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It can indeed be a bit confusing and it's a matter of the definition.

Current (positive charge) flows away from the cathode into the electrical circuit.
Mnemonic is CCD: Cathode Current Departs.
Of course in practice we have negative electrons that are the carriers of charge.
And while current flows away from the cathode, equivalently negative electrons flow into the cathode.

It means that for a CRT, we connect the cathode to the negative pole of our power source.
Note that the cathode itself is not the negative pole.
Consequently positive charge flows from the cathode into the power source.
Equivalently, negative electrons flow from the negative pole of the power source into the cathode where they are spit out and fly into the tube.

View attachment 9585

In a voltaic cell, current flows again away from the cathode.
Consequently the cathode itself is the plus pole of the voltaic cell.
Equivalently, the negative electrons flow from the electrical circuit into the cathode where the electrons bind to positive metal ions in the solution.

View attachment 9584
 

Attachments

  • 400px-Galvanic_cell_with_no_cation_flow.png
    400px-Galvanic_cell_with_no_cation_flow.png
    9.1 KB · Views: 128
  • crt.png
    crt.png
    2 KB · Views: 138
You can blame Benjamin Franklin and others of that time! When initially studying static electricity and the way it moves from one place to anther (strictly speaking they weren't working with current then) they arbitrarily assigned "positive" to one pole and "negative" to the other. They did not know that it was the negatively charged electron that carried the current and got the assignment backwards.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top