Proving the Harmonic Property of Analytic Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultimateguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the Laplacian of the real and imaginary parts of an analytic function, denoted as u(x,y) and v(x,y), respectively, is zero, confirming their harmonic nature. The Cauchy-Riemann conditions are essential in this proof, as they establish the relationship between the derivatives of u and v. The participants clarify the correct formulation of the Laplacian operator, \(\nabla^2\), and discuss the implications of normal vectors to the curves defined by u and v. The second part of the homework, which involves showing a specific relationship between the derivatives of u and v, is also addressed successfully using the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of analytic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Knowledge of Laplace's equation and harmonic functions
  • Basic vector calculus, including the concept of normal vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations in complex analysis
  • Explore the properties of harmonic functions and their significance in potential theory
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of analytic functions and their level curves
  • Investigate the relationship between harmonic functions and boundary value problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of complex analysis, mathematicians focusing on harmonic functions, and educators teaching the properties of analytic functions will benefit from this discussion.

ultimateguy
Messages
122
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The functions u(x,y) and v(x,y) are the real and imaginary parts, respectively, of an analytic function w(z).
Assuming that the required derivatives exist, show that

\bigtriangledown^2 u=\bigtriangledown^2 v=0

Solutions of Laplace's equation such as u(x,y) and v(x,y) are called harmonic functions.


Homework Equations


Cauchy-Riemann conditions:

\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}
\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} = -\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}


The Attempt at a Solution


I expanded \bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta u}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} + \frac{\delta u}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} and using the Cauchy-Riemann conditions I found

\bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}\frac{\delta v}{\delta y} + \frac{\delta v}{\delta x}\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}=\bigtriangledown^2 v

What I can't figure out how to do is prove that this is equal to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your eqs. for del^2 are wrong.
\nabla^2 u=\partial_x\partial_x u+\partial_y\partial_y u.
 
Dang, you're right. Can I dot it into an element of length like this?

\bigtriangledown^2 u \bullet d\vec{r}^2 = \frac{\delta}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} dx^2 + \frac{\delta}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} dy^2
 
There is a hint in the problem that says I need to construct vectors normal to the curves u(x,y)=c_i and v(x,y)=c_j. Wow, I'm pretty lost.
 
The Cauchy-Riemann equations are
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}
\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}
which is what you have, allowing for your peculiar use of \delta rather than \partial!

Now just do the obvious: differentiate both sides of the first equation with respect to x and differentiate both sides of the second equation with respect to y and compare them.

Are you sure that the hint is for this particular problem? A normal vector to u(x,y)= c is
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{j}
and a normal vector to v(x,y)= c is
\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\vec{j}.
Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, that second equation is
-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{j}
which tells us the the two families of curves are orthogonal but that does not directly tell us about \nabla^2 u and \nabla^2 v.
 
Thanks for your reply.

There is a part b) to the problem, and it is this:

b) Show that

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0

I solved it easily using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, so I figured that the hint was for the first part.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K