I Cauchy Stress Tensor in Applied Strength of Materials

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Cauchy stress tensor used in applied strength of materials and the stress-energy tensor in relativity. It highlights that the stress-energy tensor is essentially a four-dimensional extension of the Cauchy stress tensor, incorporating a time component. The engineering stress tensor focuses on space-space components in the material's rest frame, differing from the relativistic tensor due to momentum terms. The conversation suggests that while engineering courses primarily deal with the Cauchy tensor, theoretical courses may explore the stress-energy tensor. A recommended resource for further understanding is "Classical Field Theory" by Davison E. Soper, which addresses continuum mechanics and incorporates Lorentz invariance.
dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
I am in a course in applied strength of materials and we often use the 3D stress tensor for stress analysis of materials i.e. Mohr's circles, bending, torsion, etc. Is the stress-energy tensor in relativity basically a 4-d extension to the Cauchy stress tensor commonly used in mechanical engineering? Cauchy with the addition of a time component? Are there any engineering courses that would use the relativistic energy tensor or is that more towards the theoretical side of things?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The stress tensor used in engineering is the space-space components of the stress energy tensor in the rest frame of the material. In other words the engineering one is different from the corresponding components of the relativistic one by terms that represent the momentum carried by the bulk flow of matter across a surface.
 
  • Like
Likes dsaun777 and vanhees71
I might recommend a book, “Classical Field Theory” by Davison E. Soper. Dover 2008. The book covers areas like continuum mechanics while skipping things more of interest in quantum field theory. All things are derived from Lagrangian densities where Lorentz invariance is used. The development covers both 3 and 4 dimensional topics.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, vanhees71 and Dale
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K