I Cauchy Stress Tensor in Applied Strength of Materials

dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
I am in a course in applied strength of materials and we often use the 3D stress tensor for stress analysis of materials i.e. Mohr's circles, bending, torsion, etc. Is the stress-energy tensor in relativity basically a 4-d extension to the Cauchy stress tensor commonly used in mechanical engineering? Cauchy with the addition of a time component? Are there any engineering courses that would use the relativistic energy tensor or is that more towards the theoretical side of things?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The stress tensor used in engineering is the space-space components of the stress energy tensor in the rest frame of the material. In other words the engineering one is different from the corresponding components of the relativistic one by terms that represent the momentum carried by the bulk flow of matter across a surface.
 
  • Like
Likes dsaun777 and vanhees71
I might recommend a book, “Classical Field Theory” by Davison E. Soper. Dover 2008. The book covers areas like continuum mechanics while skipping things more of interest in quantum field theory. All things are derived from Lagrangian densities where Lorentz invariance is used. The development covers both 3 and 4 dimensional topics.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, vanhees71 and Dale
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
Back
Top