Causal signal is defined in electrical eng.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter krindik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrical Signal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A causal signal in electrical engineering is defined mathematically as f(t) = {f(t), t ≥ 0; 0, t < 0}. This definition implies that signals only have values for non-negative time, while non-causal signals can have values for negative time, which raises questions about their physical interpretation. The discussion highlights the relationship between causal signals and the Kramers-Kronig relations, emphasizing that present states depend solely on past states and not future values. The distinction between non-causal and anti-causal signals is clarified, with the latter indicating existence in the past.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of causal signals in electrical engineering
  • Familiarity with Kramers-Kronig relations
  • Basic knowledge of signal processing concepts
  • Mathematical interpretation of functions over time
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of causal and non-causal signals
  • Study the Kramers-Kronig relations in detail
  • Explore the Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory
  • Investigate practical examples of causal and anti-causal signals in engineering applications
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, signal processing professionals, and students studying time-domain analysis and signal behavior in systems.

krindik
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
Hi,

As I read, A Causal signal is defined in electrical eng. context as

f(t) = \{^{f(t), t\geq{0}}_{0, t&lt;0}

However what does it mean to have f(t) when t<0 ? ie. non-causal signal?
Is there any meaning when t<0 for any signal? In that sense all signals are causal. Isn't it?

Could u pls expain and point me correct direction.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In fact, I'm referring to Causal Signals

Pls see below for there definitions,
http://cnx.org/content/m11495/latest/

However, my question is regarding the actual physical interpretation of these signals.

what is the meaning of an anti-causal or non-causal signal which has values for negative time?

what's the meaning of negative time? is it with respect to the point in time which we start to observe the system?

can u give some examples of such signals?
 


Maybe it would help to keep in mind that the point t = 0 corresponds to 'now'. In terms of constitutive relations (e.g. Kramers-Kronig), it means that the present state of the material can only depend on *past* states of the material and incident fields, not future values.

The same type of formulation was used by Wheeler and Feynman (wheeler-feynman abosrber theory)

http://www.npl.washington.edu/npl/int_rep/dtime/node2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:


So when we refer to non-causal it means that the signal has existed before now until future and an anti-causal signal means it has existed in the past.

So when we interpret Kramers-kronig relatioship we say that \chi^{&#039;} \, ,\chi^{&#039;&#039;} depend on each others present and future values but not on any of past values?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramers-Kronig_relations"
 
Last edited by a moderator:


I'm not familiar with the way you are using non-causal as opposed to anti-causal. My understanding is that causal signals can influence present effects, non-causal signals cannot.

As for the Kramers-Kronig relation, I think you have a sign error: the response functions only depend on past (or present) stimuli.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
559
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K