Causality and the inhomogeneous wave equation with a moving source

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the inhomogeneous wave equation, specifically u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx}=F_{xx}, with a moving source represented by F=A(x)sech^2\left(\frac{x-c_gt}{B}\right). The parameters c, c_g, and B are real numbers, with c_g being less than c. The user, Nick, expresses confusion regarding the expected intensity of the response and the behavior of rays traveling at different speeds. An analytical solution is provided, indicating that the general solution can be derived for linear functions A(x)=ax+b, and emphasizes the importance of imposing initial conditions for specific solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with wave equations and their properties
  • Knowledge of numerical methods, specifically the method of Duhamel
  • Experience with analytical solutions for linear functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Duhamel for solving inhomogeneous wave equations
  • Explore analytical solutions for more complex forms of A(x)
  • Learn about the physical interpretation of wave propagation in different media
  • Investigate numerical stability and accuracy in half-domain problems
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and applied mathematicians working with wave equations, particularly those interested in the effects of moving sources and inhomogeneous media.

nickthequick
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am confused about my solutions to the following governing equation:

u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx}=F_{xx}

For F=A(x)sech^2\left(\frac{x-c_gt}{B}\right)


Where c,c_g,B \in \mathbb{R} and A(x) is a linear function. Also, we have c_g<c. Substituting physical values for the parameters, I can solve the equation using a 2-d integrator to implement the method of Duhamel. My solutions are unclear to me though.

I expect to see the intensity of the response increase with position, as it does along the ray traveling at c_g. I do not, however, see the same response out of the ray traveling at c. I also do not see a ray traveling at -c, as I naively would expect. In the plot attached, the ray traveling at speed c is the lower one, since this is an x-t diagram.

I also would think that the ray traveling at speed c would constantly be generated at the location of the forcing, otherwise it is unclear to me how the information from the forcing would get to the faster wave traveling at speed c.

I think my numerical implementation is fine. Perhaps the fact that I'm working on the half domain, x \ge 0 is messing things up?

Any help is appreciated,

Nick
 

Attachments

  • testplot.jpg
    testplot.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 542
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately, I can not grasp the physical sense of your problem out of hand from your picture, but it seems to me that you may analyse the analytical solution of your problem.

For linear A(x)=ax+b the general solution to your PDE is relatively easy:

u(t,x) = C_1(x+ct)+C_2(x-ct)+4\{[-a(c^2-c_g^2)x-bc^2+c_g^2(aB+b)]\exp[-2(x-c_gt)/B]+aBc_g^2\}\{exp[-2(x-c_gt)/B]+1\}^{-2}(c^2-c_g^2)^{-2},

where C_1,C_2 are arbitrary functions.

I hope that the like solution can be found for more complicated A(x).

Then you have to impose the initial conditions of your physical problem to obtain particular solution which then can be analysed under your goals.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K